IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, Jyoti Singh, JJ.
Kalpana Singh - Appellants
Vs.
Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. - Respondent
W.P. (C) 115/2021
Decided On : 11-01-2021
Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Petitioner's request for termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks due to foetal abnormality - Sections 3(2)(b) and 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 discussed
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought permission for medical termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks due to foetal abnormality. The Medical Board opined that termination could be offered.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's pregnancy could be terminated based on the medical report and the opinions of the Medical Board.
Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of Sections 3(2)(b) and 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 in cases of termination beyond 20 weeks due to foetal abnormality.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous judgments where termination was permitted beyond 20 weeks in cases of foetal abnormalities incompatible with life, emphasizing the right to preserve the life and health of the pregnant woman.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy beyond 20 weeks, citing the opinions of the Medical Board and the urgency of the matter.
JUDGMENT :
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, J.
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
1. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:
b. For a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing section 3(2)(b) of The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 971 to the limited extent that it stipulates a ceiling of 20 weeks for an abortion to be done under section 3, as ultra vires Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
c For a declaration to the effect that the expression "save the life of the pregnant woman" in Section 5 of the MTP Act includes "the protection of the mental and physical health of the pregnant woman" and also incorporates situations where serious abnormalities in the foetus are detected after the 20th week of pregnancy.
d. For an order directing the Respondent No. 3 for setting up an expert panel of doctors to assess the pregnancy and offer MTP to the petitioner in need of the procedure beyond the prescribed 20 weeks limit.
e. For any other order/direction that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit."
2. As per the case set out in the petition, petitioner had got Ultrasonography conducted on 31st December, 2020 at gestational stage of 27 weeks 5 days which reveals that the foetus suffered from Anencephaly +. Based on the said report, which indicated a fetal abnormality the petitioner consulted her Gynaecologist at Lady Hardinge Medical College and requested for medical termination of pregnancy. However, since the permissible limit of 20 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act had already crossed, the petitioner's request was declined. Report dated 31st December, 2020 is annexed at Annexure P-3 to the memo of this writ petition and is as follows:-
|
| "UHID: 20200157120 | |||||||
|
| Lady Hardinge Medical College And Smt. S.K. Hospital Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 |
| ||||||
| CONSULTING ROOM NO | Casualty EHR ID: 20000216047507830 | |||||||
| CLINIC: Gynae Casualty TOKEN NO: 101 | ||||||||
|
| CASUALTY | |||||||
| Department: Main Casualty | Fees: Rs. 0 | |||||||
| ER No: 2020/078/0056128 | GC/551273 Unit : CASUALTY | |||||||
| Name: MRS. KALPANA PRAKASH | 31/12/2020 /11PM W/O: | |||||||
| Date of Registration: 31.12.2020 10:49:37 PM Sex: Female Age:25 Y | ||||||||
| Billing Type: GENERAL | Religion: UNKNOWN | |||||||
| Mobile No.: *******294 | Occupation: UNKNOWN | |||||||
| Address: F-7 SHANKAR MARKET CENTRAL DELHI, DELHI, INDIA | ||||||||
| Patient Type: NON MLC | Prepared By: Mr. Satveer Singh | |||||||
| Brought By: Self | Email: | |||||||
| Presenting Complaints: | Investigation | |||||||
| Temp – 87.49 Primi/23 + 6 Wks. POG/Pain in abdomen/since morning | ||||||||
| No C/L (illegible) | c Gastuco No C/o BPV / LPV | |||||||
| Examination : Primi/SPC P : BP: M/N – Prev. cycle regulation 3-4d.any flow 28-3LMP-16 Jul 2020 R: | ||||||||
|
| P / u : NAD P / u : NAD |
| ||||||
| Doctor’s Name | Signature/Date | |||||||
| Patient Consent: I, the holder of the above mentioned mobile number, herewith give my consent to share my electronic health information with 'My Health Record', an initiative of Govt. of India. I understand that I can revoke/withhold this consent through site | ||||||||
|
| (https://myhealthrecord.nhp.gov.in) /c ucp (illegible) PO (illegible) BP-103/86 PR – 84 min. | |||||||
| USG-31/12/2020 NMC: SL/UF (illegible) FL – 27 + 5 wks | ||||||||
|
| - USG for PWB + r/o ectopic stat - T. Rantop 40mg stat given - Pt. Obsecured in GC x 3 wks. Comfortable No C/O BPV/LPV Pt. counselled i/v/o poor prognosis of fetus & prolong POG Pt. & husband both counselled and advice | |||||||
| Advice: F/U in GOPD c/m F/U in GOPD thus 2pm Fetal medicine OPD T. PA 5mg. 10 D ((illegible)” | ||||||||
3. The matter was listed before us on 7th January,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.