SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 124

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Court On Its Own Motion - Appellant
Versus
Gnct Of Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3270/2020
Decided On : 07-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Asc, Mr.Sanayam Suri, Advocate, Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel, North Mcd. With Mr. Hardik Aggarwal, Mr. Vivek Singhal, And Ms. Unnati Chauhan, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The Court's decision was based on the change in circumstances, leading to the petition's irrelevance

Headnote:

Public Interest Litigation - Covid-19 Pandemic - Court initiated proceedings to address shortage of facilities for cremation of Covid victims

Fact of the Case:

The Court initiated the Public Interest Litigation during the Covid-19 pandemic due to reports of a shortage of facilities for cremation of Covid victims

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the situation had significantly changed over time, rendering the petition irrelevant in the current context, and therefore closed the proceedings

Issues: Shortage of facilities for cremation of Covid victims

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the significant change in the situation over time, making the petition irrelevant

Final Decision: The Court closed the proceedings at this stage due to the loss of relevancy in the current context

ORDER

1. This Court had suo moto initiated the present Public Interest Litigation at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic on 28.05.2020 taking cognizance of news reports, which showed that a large number of dead bodies of Covid victims were lying in hospitals, mortuaries and cremation grounds and cremation was not being undertaken of the dead due to shortage of sufficient facilities. In the background of large number of deaths suffered due to the pandemic, certain orders have been passed in the proceedings from time to time. Status reports were filed and it appears that certain steps have also been taken.

2. The situation has undertaken a sea change with the passage of time and the present petition has, therefore, lost its relevancy in today's context. We, accordingly, close these proceedings at this stage.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top