IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Asha Menon, J.
HTC Corporation - Appellant
Versus
Mr. Lv Degao & Ors. - Respondents
CS(COMM) 263/2020
Decided On : 06-04-2022
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908- Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 – Trade Mark – Infringement of - ‘High Tech Computer Corporation’- HTC - Suit for declaration, permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, dilution, unfair competition, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery up etc.
Finding of the Court:
Plaintiff’s Trade Mark is “well-known” and there is “goodwill” in respect of its goods. Considering the fact, as noticed above, that the same company may produce different products that are seemingly unconnected and dissimilar and not cognate, it is possible for a common consumer to believe that the products of the defendants were originating from the plaintiff and thus, though the “goodwill” is qua the specific products of the plaintiff, would still be available to enhance the sale of the defendants - Balance of convenience” lies in favour of the plaintiff inasmuch as the products of the defendants have been launched only lately and the invoices show that these products have been in the market only since 2017 and the sales are few and far between.
Result: Disposed of
ORDER
I.A. 5795/2020 (by the plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-l & 2 CPC for interim injunction)
1. This order will dispose of the application [I.A. 5795/2020] under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, "CPC") filed by the plaintiff along with the suit for declaration, permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, dilution, unfair competition, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery up etc.
2. The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of Taiwan and claims to be a leading manufacturer of consumer electronic items, such as, smart phones, mobile phones, personal digital assistant (PDA) devices, virtual reality head-mounted displays, etc. The plaintiff was initially incorporated in the year 1997 as High Tech Computer Corporation', but gained popularity quickly as "HTC" and has been known as such since 1998. The plaintiff also used these alphabets for the first time in 1998 in relation to its product i.e., a phone named "HTC Kangaroo". In 2008, the plaintiff formally changed its name to "HTC Corporation" reflecting the growing popularity of the "HTC" brand.
3. The plaintiff got the Trade Mark [IMAGE] registered in India in Class-9 on 12th May, 2006, vide Registration No. 1451016 which was valid till 12th May, 2026. It has been doing business in India using the said Trade Mark hTC since 2007, though it had begun using it internationally since 2006. In 2008, the plaintiff also launched the first ever Android-based mobile phone under the trade mark /HTC Dream in India. It applied for and was granted registration of the Trade Mark hTC on 24th January, 2008 vide Registration No. 1645578 in Class-9 in India. On 24th November, 2011, the plaintiff applied for and was granted registration of its Trade Mark HTC ONE in Class 9 in India. On 7th March, 2014, the plaintiff obtained international registration for the Trade Mark hTC in China in Class 9 vide Registration No.6481646 and on 21st March, 2015, in Class 8 vide Registration No. 12262154.
4. The details of the registration in more than 90 jurisdictions across the world have been listed in para No. 8 of the plaint, and in India, in para No.9 of the plaint, which are reproduced as under: -
TRADE MARK REGISTRATIONS - INTERNATIONAL
| Sl. No. | Trade Mark | Registration No. | Registration Date | Class | Country |
| 1. | hTC | 1220583 | 23/1/2008 | 9 | Australia |
| 2. | hTC | 829569715 | 28/1/2008 | 9 | Brazil |
| 3. | hTC | 6540975 | 4/12/2008 | 9 | European Union |
| 4. | hTC | 5226352 | 24/4/2009 | 9 | Japan |
| 5. | hTC | 1226215 | 21/3/2015 | 8 | China |
| 6. | hTC | 8020903 | 7/3/2014 | 9 | China |
| 7. | hTC | 3636164 | 09/06/2009 | 9 | United States of America |
| 8. | hTC | 393552 | 12/11/2009 | 9 | Russia |
| 9. | hTC | T0800791B | 23/1/2008 | 9 | Singapore |
| 10. | hTC | 106187 | 9/2/2011 | 9 | United Arab Emirates |
| 11. | hTC | 571980 | 22/1/2008 | 9 | Switzerland |
| 12. | hTC | 60914 | 28/8/2009 | 9 | OAPI (African Intellectual Property Organization) |
| 13. | hTC | 40-0846192 | 13/12/2010 | 9 | Korea |
| 14. | hTC | 8001302 | 27/12/2007 | 9 | Malaysia |
| 15. | hTC | 142900382 | 4/7/2009 | 9 | Saudi Arabia |
| 16. | hTC | 1323541 | 16/8/2009 | 9 | Taiwan |
| 17. | hTC | 2008/01202 | 27/12/2007 | 9 | South Africa |
| 18. | hTC | TMA745326 | 13/8/2009 | 9 | Canada |
TRADE MARK REGISTRATIONS INDIA
| Trade Mark Registration No. and Date | Trade Mark | Class | Description of Goods | Renewal Status |
| 1645578 24/1/200 8 | Htc | 9 | Mobile phones; video phones; smart phones; personal digital assistants; voice over internet protocol phones; camera phones; tablet computers; slim computers; ultra mobile personal computers; accessories for the above goods, namely, headset, headsets with wireless transmission function, synchronization cable, cradle, battery, AC adaptor, chargers, etc | Renewed and valid till 24/1/2028 |
| 1451016 12/5/200 6 | Htc | 9 | Mobile phones, video phones, smart phones, personal digital assistants (PDA | |
Cadila Health Care Ltd. vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
N.R. Dongre vs. Whirlpool Corpn.
Nandhini Deluxe vs. Karnataka Coop. Milk Producers Federation Ltd.
National Bell Co. & Ors. vs. Metal Goods Mfg. Co. Ltd. & Anr.
T.V. Venugopal vs. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd. & Another
VishnudasKishandas vs. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., Hyderabad and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.