PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
ORDER
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral). - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
Eviction of Occupants from the Kalkaji Mandir Premises
3. Vide the previous order dated 15th March, 2022, this Court had passed the following directions:
"6. This Court has perused the report that has been placed on record jointly by the DDA, SDMC, DUSI Band other officials including the counsels appearing for them. Keeping in mind the contents of the report, this Court is of the opinion that at best there may be 40 families occupying the Jhuggis and Dharamshalas who may not have adequate means and who need some compassionate consideration. However, these occupants have been in occupation of these unauthorized tenaments for the last several years in a prime area in South Delhi. Thus, no exception of free accommodation can be given to them, however, in view of the fact that the Court has taken a compassionate view considering the financial standing of the occupants, it is directed as under:
(i) The Id. Administrator would meet one representative from each of the families of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.