Neeta Bhardwaj vs Kamlesh Sharma - 2022 Supreme(Del) 221

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 221

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Arun Birbal, Ms. Sonia Singhani, Mr. Sanjay Singh & Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advocates for DDA and SDMC with Mr. Manish Gupta, Vice Chairman, DDA and Gyanesh Bharti, Commissioner, SDMC. Ms. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Arun Panwar & Mr. Siddharth Krishna Dwivedi, Advocates, Ms. Sampika Biswal & Ms. hambhavi Kala, Advocates for Ld. Administrator, Mr. Krishan Gopal Chhokar, Advocate Mr. R.K. Sinha, Advocate, Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, DUSIB with Ms. Garima Gupta, CEO, DUSIB, Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Ms. Latika Malhotra & Ms. Shikha Baisoya, Advocates, Ms. Sonia Singhania & Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Kush Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Nitin Jain, Mr. Vishal Chauhan, Mr. Shivya Sharma, Mr. K.P. Singh, Mr. Harshil Gupta & Mr. Himanshu Chauhan, Advocates for Shopkeepers. Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj &Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Vipul Gaur, Advocate, Mr. Rohit Kishan Naagpal & Mr. Dipanshu Gaba, Advocates. Mr. Sarvesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for Plaintiff. Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, Architect. Ms. Esha Pandey, Counsel for the Parties.

ORDER

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These are part heard matters.

FAO 36/2021 & CM APPLs.2914/2021, 10442/2021, 10444/2021, 20904/2021, 23819/2021, 25868/2021, 25869/2021, 25870/2021, 25884/2021, 26495/2021, 29121/2021, 25885/2021, 43944-46/2021, 3172/2022, 3455/2022, 5641/2022, 5642/2022, 38063/2021, 38289/2021, 39643/2021, 5803/2022, 5865/2022, 7745-46/2022

3. Pursuant to the previous order dated 2nd March, 2022, Mr. Manish Gupta, Vice Chairman, DDA, Ms. Garima Gupta, CEO, DUSIB, Ms. Esha Pandey, DCP, South East Delhi, and Mr. Gyanesh Bharti, Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation have all joined the proceedings.

4. The redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir premises is to take place, however this Court's interaction with the ld. Administrator as also the Architect and the other assisting counsels to the ld. Administrator, has revealed that certain jhuggi dwellers and some Dharamshala occupants have not yet vacated the premises.

5. Vide previous orders of this Court dated 27th September, 2021, 7 th December, 2021, 9th December, 2021 and 24 th December, 2021, it was made amply clear that none of the occupants who are in illegal occupation of the Mandir prem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Del) 221

PRATHIBA M.SINGHNeeta Bhardwaj – AppellantVersusKamlesh Sharma – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent