SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 227

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Alok Kumar Tiwari - Appellant
Versus
Mamta - Respondent
CRL.M.C. 1312/2021, CRL.M.A. 6772/2021;
Decided On : 02-03-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. H.K Chaturvedi, Ms. Anjali Chaturvedi, Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi & Ms. Megha Chaturvedi, Advocates; Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate, for the Appellant.

Subordinate court can only make a reference to the High Court and cannot initiate contempt proceedings itself.

Headnote:

Contempt of Courts Act - Quashing of Complaint - Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the quashing of a complaint filed by the respondent under Section 10 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and consequential proceedings. The respondent had filed the application for contempt of court before the Trial Court, which had issued the notice to the respondent for knowing the fate of the application and sending the same to the High Court for necessary action.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the subordinate court can only make a reference to the High Court and cannot initiate contempt proceedings itself. The impugned notice issued by the learned MM in complaint no. 609 of 2021 under Section 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was set aside, without any observations on the merits or demerits of the prayer made in the contempt application.

Issues: Quashing of complaint under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Ratio Decidendi: Subordinate court can only make a reference to the High Court and cannot initiate contempt proceedings itself.

Final Decision: The petition is disposed of. Copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court.

ORDER

1. The petitioner vide the present petition has sought the quashing of the complaint no. 609/2021 filed by the respondent under Section 10 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and consequential proceedings emanating therefrom being notice dated 06.04.2021 issued by the learned MM in complaint no. 609/2021 submitting to the effect that the Trial Court could not have proceeded in terms of the Section 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in view of the provisions of Sections 10,11 & 12 and also provisions of Sections 13,14 & 15 of the said enactment which read as under:

    "10. Power of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate courts.Every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers and authority, in accordance with the same procedure and practice, in respect of contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has and exercises in respect of contempts of itself:

    Provided that no High Court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860).

    11. Power of High Court to try offences committed or offenders found outside jurisdiction.A High Court shall have jurisdiction to inquire into or try a contempt of itself or of any court subordinate to it, whether the contempt is alleged to have been committed within or outside the local limits of its jurisdiction, and whether the person alleged to be guilty of contempt is within or outside such limits.

    12. Punishment for contempt of court.(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act or in any other law, a contempt of court may be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both:

    Provided that the accused may be discharged or the punishment awarded may be remitted on apology being made to the satisfaction of the court.

    Explanation.An apology shall not be rejected merely on the ground that it is qualified or conditional if the accused makes it bona fide.

    (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, nocourt shall impose a sentence in excess of that specified in sub-section(i) for any contempt either in respect of itself or of a court subordinate to it.

    (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where a person is found guilty of a civil contempt, the court, if it considers that a fine will not meet the ends of justice and that a sentence of imprisonment is necessary shall, instead of sentencing him to simple imprisonment, direct that he be detained in a civil prison for such period not exceeding six months as it may think fit.

    (4) Where the person found guilty of contempt of court in respect of any undertaking given to a court is a company, every person who, at the time the contempt was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the contempt and the punishment may be enforced with the leave of the court, by the detention in civil prison of each such person:

    Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to such punishment if he proves that the contempt was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent its commission.

    (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (4), where the contempt of court referred to therein has been committed by a company and it is proved that the contempt has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of the contempt and the punishment may be enforced, with the leave of the court, by the detention in civil prison of such director,

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top