SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 234

ASHA MENON
Shailendra Ghai – Appellant
Versus
Anil Ghai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate, for the Appellant, Mr. Atul Nigam. Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

O.A.30/2021 (by the plaintiff under Chapter II Rule 5 Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 read with Section 151 CPC), I.As.16272/2021 (by the respondent under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 3 days in filing the accompanying chamber appeal) & 16273/2021 (by the respondent under Chapter IV Rule 3 (e) read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act and Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 10 days in filing the accompanying chamber appeal)

1. This is an appeal that has been filed by the plaintiff being aggrieved with the orders of the Joint Registrar dated 8th October, 2021 directing the plaintiff to pay the deficient Court Fees without fail before the next date of hearing.

2. I.A. no. 16272/2021 has been filed seeking condonation of delay of three days in filing the appeal.

3. Mr. Prag Chawla learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the suit has been filed for partition and the Fixed Court Fees has already been paid. It is his contention that merely because the Registry raised an objection, the learned Joint Registrar could not have directed the plaintiff to pay the deficient Court Fees without first applying its

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top