SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Aashima Goyal - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C)No. 6932 of 2021 and CM No.21882 of 2021
Decided On : 25-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr J. Sai Deepak, Mr Avinash Sharma, Mr R. Abhishek and Mr Ankur Vyas, Advocates,, for the Appellant; Mr Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr Kushagra Kumar, Advocate, Mr Naresh Kaushik, Standing Counsel for UPSC along with Mr Anand Singh and Mr Abhishek Verma, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The court emphasized the importance of timely submission of required documents and the need to meet the prescribed income eligibility criteria for reservation categories.

Headnote:

CANCELLATION - Civil Services Examination - Right to Information Act, 2005 - Income and Asset Certificate - Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category - Office Memorandum (OM) dated 31.01.2019 - OM dated 19.01.2019

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's candidature for Civil Services Examination, 2019 was cancelled due to failure to submit the requisite Income and Asset Certificate (I&A Certificate) before the stipulated deadline and not meeting the eligibility criteria for the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. The petitioner approached the Tribunal and subsequently filed a writ petition against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing the original application.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner failed to submit the I&A Certificate for the relevant period before the prescribed deadline and did not meet the income eligibility criteria stipulated in the Office Memorandum (OM) dated 31.01.2019. The court also rejected the petitioner's argument regarding relaxation given to other candidates and the reliance on the Tehsildar's certificate for income eligibility.

Issues: 1. Submission of Income and Asset Certificate for the relevant period before the deadline. 2. Meeting the income eligibility criteria for the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's failure to submit the I&A Certificate before the deadline and the doubt regarding the petitioner fulfilling the family income eligibility criteria led to the dismissal of the writ petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the pending application was closed with no order as to costs.

ORDER

Rajiv Shakdher, J. - Preface:-

1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.06.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereafter referred to as "the Tribunal"] in O.A.No.53/2021 [in short "OA"]

2. The petitioner had approached the Tribunal to assail the decision of respondent no. 1/Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) dated 09.09.2020, whereby her candidature for Civil Services Examination, 2019 [in short "CSE 2019"] was cancelled.

2.1. According to the petitioner, she became aware of her candidature being cancelled only when she received information on 11.12.2020, in response to her application filed under the Right to Information Act, 2005, dated 01.12.2020.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the petitioner's candidature, as per the respondents, stood cancelled for two reasons :

    (i) First, she had failed to submit the requisite Income and Asset Certificate [in short "I&A Certificate"] before the stipulated deadline,

    (ii) Second, the I&A Certificate filed by the petitioner, albeit after the deadline stipulated, disclosed that she did not meet the eligibility criteria for securing the post under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category.

    3.1. What is not in dispute is that the petitioner, to take the benefit of reservation under the EWS category, would have had to demonstrate that her family had a gross annual income below Rs.8 lakhs and that insofar as CSE 2019 was concerned, the applicable financial year [in short 'FY'] was 2017-18 [assessment year (AY) 2018-19].

    3.2. It is also not in dispute that the provisions of the Office Memorandum (OM) dated 31.01.2019 read with the OM dated 19.01.2019 applied to the petitioner.

    3.3. As per the aforementioned OM, concededly, the expression 'family' includes the person seeking the benefit of the reservation, his/her parents and siblings below the age of 18 years, as also his/her spouse and children below the age of 18 years.

    Background:-

    4. With this preface, the following broad facts are required to be noticed.

    4.1. The petitioner had sat for CSE 2019. The petitioner cleared, both the preliminary and the main examination as well as the interview. The petitioner secured 65th rank in the merit list, and was, consequently, recommended by respondent no.2 i.e., Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) for allocation of service.

    4.2. Concededly, the petitioner in the first instance, albeit, after the preliminary examination was held, erroneously submitted the I&A Certificate for F.Y. 2018-19 dated 24.06.2019.

    4.3. After the result for the main examination was declared (which was published on 14.01.2020), UPSC, via an e-mail dated 25.02.2020, informed the petitioner that a discrepancy had been noticed in her detailed application form [in short "DAF"] concerning the I&A Certificate submitted by her. It was pointed out that the I&A Certificate issued to her was not for F.Y.2017-18; which was the relevant F.Y. for which the I&A Certificate was required to be appended to the DAF.

    4.4. Via a communication dated 02.03.2020, UPSC wrote to the petitioner that while verifying her documents for the personality test, it was noticed that she had not produced the I&A Certificate for F.Y.2017-18. Accordingly, it was conveyed to the petitioner that her candidature for CSE 2019 was provisional; an aspect which was explained to her in person, as well by the concerned officer. The aspect involving the fact that she had submitted an undertaking to submit the requisite document in original form within 15 days of verification, failing which her candidature would stand cancelled, was also conveyed to the petitioner.

    4.5. It appears that the petitioner was unable to obtain the I&A Certificate for F.Y.2017-18, within the stipulated period of 15 days, and, therefore, despite her undertaking, she shot off an e-mail dated 17.03.2020 to respondent no. 1 with a copy to UPSC, whereby she contended that as per the gazette notification issued for CSE 2019, she was required to submit the I&A Certif

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top