JUDGMENT

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

I.A. 102/2022 (u/O. XXIII Rule 3 r/w S. 151 CPC)

1. The present application has been jointly filed by plaintiff and defendants praying for issuance of decree in terms of prayer clause 31 (a), (b) & (c) of the present suit and for refund of entire Court fees.

2. The captioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trade mark/ trading name/corporate name, passing off, unfair competition, delivery up, damages, etc. against the defendants.

3. This court is informed that the plaintiff and defendants have amicably resolved their disputes out of court, in terms as stated in Paragraph 2 of the present application.

4. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that in terms of settlement, the present suit be decreed against defendants.

5. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the application and in specific contents of Para-2 thereof, this Court finds that the settlement reached between the parties is valid and lawful.

6. Accordingly, the present joint application filed by the plaintiff and defendants is allowed.

7. Needless to say, parties