SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 304

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Shakiluddin @ Babloo – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State, Insp. Balmukund Rai, PS Chandni Mahal, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. - The present revision petition U/s 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner/revisionist with prayer to set aside the impugned order Dated 09.01.2020 passed by Ms. Neelofer Abida Perveen, Additional Sessions Judge, (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide which the Ld. Trial Court ordered to frame the charge U/s 302 IPC against the petitioner/revisionist.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that on 29.12.2017, complainant alongwith his son went to house No. 808, Kamra Bangash to attend the marriage of son of one Shahid who was also residing at Kamra Bangash. During the barat procession, the complainant, his son and other persons were watching the barat from roof. The petitioner/revisionist was also present in the said barat and at about 11:00 p.m. petitioner/revisionist started firing from his pistol and fired one bullet towards the son of the complainant which hit him on the right side of his chest. The son of the petitioner fell down and thereafter he was removed to the hospital.

3. Initially, on the statement of the complainant and the MLC a case U/s 307/336 IPC & 27/54/59 Arms Act was registered. Thereafter injured Naeem died and section 302

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top