JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

1. This writ petition is directed against the judgement of the learned single judge dated 10.11.2021, passed in W.P.(C) No. 6318/2013. The learned single judge via the impugned judgment has partially allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No. 1. The learned single judge has quashed the order dated 10.10.2012, passed by the Memorial Authority [hereafter referred to as “MA”], to the extent it held that the period for which order of removal from service qua respondent No. 1 remained in force, it would constitute a break in service.

2. Besides this, the learned single judge has also directed the MA to reconsider the case insofar as it failed to examine the issues concerning payment of emoluments and treatment to be accorded to the intervening period for which respondent No. 1 remained out of service i.e., till the time he was reinstated in service. The MA was, thus, required to examine these aspects in the backdrop of Rule 22 of the General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 [in short “CDA Rules”].

3. The appellant is aggrieved by the directions issued by the learned single judge insofar as he has set aside the order of MA concerning