JYOTI SINGH
Dhananjay Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Shree Vasu Steels Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jyoti Singh, J.
I.A. No. 9048/2022 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, by Plaintiff)
1. Present application has been preferred on behalf of the Plaintiff to implead Members/Trustees of Rathi Research Centre (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Centre’) as party Defendants to the present suit. Ordinarily, this Court would have sought reply to the application on behalf of the Defendants, however, the application is being decided without calling for a reply, in view of the common ground between the parties that the ‘Centre’ is a necessary party in the present suit.
2. A short expose of facts required for the purpose of deciding the present application is that in and around the year 1942, three male members of Rathi Family namely, Mr. G.D. Rathi, Mr. K.L. Rathi and Mr. H.K. Rathi started a company called Rathi Steel Rolling Mills (‘RSRM’) under the trademark RATHI, which was adopted as a trading name. In the year 1968, RSRM entered into a technical collaboration with M/s. TOR Istag Steel Corporation for manufacturing of TOR Steel Bars under the registered trademark RATHI. In 1969, RSRM split into two different groups and two companies were set up, namely, M/s. G.D. Rathi Steels Limited and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.