SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 598

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TALWANT SINGH, J.
Mohd Anas - Petitioner
Versus
State (Govt NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Bail Appln. No. 3475 of 2021
Decided On : 19-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Mr. M.K. Khan, Mr. Aman Mirza and Mr. C.B. Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ravi Nayak, A.P.P., with SI Nishant.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 308/323/509/34/336/324 - Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 41A - Marriage - Started Harassing Her - Opened Fire With Illegal Pistols - Anticipatory Bail - Petitioner and his family members are innocent persons - Cousin brother of petitioner, got married with daughter of Mohd. Shakir, from complainant side and no dowry was exchanged at time of marriage and two children have been born of said wedlock - Family of petitioner and complainant are relatives of each other - Wife of cousin brother of petitioner started harassing her - Some persons from complainant side came to house of cousin brother of petitioner with intention to kill him and opened fire with illegal country made pistols - Somehow, cousin brother of petitioner was able to save his life - Attackers made a false PCR call and tried to implicate cousin brother of petitioner, who also made a PCR call and FIR under Section 336 IPC and 27 of Arms Act was registered.

Finding of the Court :

In case of present petitioner, weapon of offence, i.e., cane is yet to be recovered - Keeping in view fact that present petitioner has not joined investigation when called upon by IO; he has not cooperated in investigation; in photographs of incident, he is seen holding a cane in his hand and said cane, weapon of offence, is yet to be recovered and for said purpose, custodial interrogation of present petitioner is required, so Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to present applicant.

Result : Application dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Talwant Singh, J.

1. The petitioner has moved this anticipatory bail application in FIR No. 0455/2021 dated 28.08.2021 under Section 308/323/509/34 IPC, registered at PS Welcome District, North East Delhi.

2. It has been submitted that the petitioner and his family members are innocent persons. The cousin brother of the petitioner, namely Asad got married with the daughter of Mohd. Shakir, from the complainant side on 24.03.2012 and no dowry was exchanged at the time of the marriage and two children have been born of the said wedlock.

3. The family of the petitioner and the complainant are relatives of each other. The wife of the cousin brother of the petitioner started harassing her husband and some matrimonial disputes arose between them. A meeting of the relatives was called at DESU Park, Jafrabad, Delhi, to work out the settlement. During the course of conversation, the quarrel started and father-in-law of the cousin brother of the petitioner took away his daughter without the consent of her husband. Complaints were filed by both the sides against each other at PS Welcome, Delhi. Efforts for settlement were made but were of no use.

4. On 02.04.2021, some persons from the complainant side came to the house of the cousin brother of the petitioner with intention to kill him and opened fire with illegal country made pistols. Somehow, the cousin brother of the petitioner was able to save his life. The attackers made a false PCR call and tried to implicate the cousin brother of the petitioner, who also made a PCR call and FIR No. 0186/2021 dated 03.04.2021 under Section 336 IPC and 27 of Arms Act was registered.

5. One of the accused, Astakeem was arrested, however, no other person has been arrested till date in the said FIR. The cousin brother of the petitioner sent a complaint dated 07.04.2021 to the higher authorities for taking action against attackers under relevant provision of law. The accused Astakeem in the said FIR was later on released on bail.

6. It has been further submitted that on 28.08.2021, at about 11:30 P.M., when the petitioner was going to his home, one Jumma and his son Faizan started abusing and beating the petitioner. Few other persons joined them and all of them started beating the petitioner with kicks and fists. Faizan attacked the petitioner with sharp object, causing injury on his nose and when the petitioner regained his consciousness, he found himself outside his house; the police was called and he was admitted to a hospital.

7. The petitioner filed a complaint dated 28.08.2021 to the SHO against the above culprits and requested for taking action. An FIR bearing No. 0456/2021 dated 28.08.2021 under Section 324/34 IPC in respect of the said incident was registered. The said attackers have not been arrested till date and they are forcing the petitioner to withdraw the said FIR.

8. On the other hand, the said attackers from the complainant side have got registered a false and frivolous FIR bearing No. 0455/2021 dated 28.08.2021 under Section 308/323/509/34 IPC as a counter blast to the said FIR launched on the complaint of the present applicant. In the said complaint, Faizan has alleged that he and his family members were allegedly beaten up by the petitioner and his family members on 28.08.2021. In fact, it was Faizan and his family members who had attacked the petitioner on 28.08.2021.

9. On 04.09.2021, the Police along with Rapid Action Force came to the house of the petitioner to illegally and unlawfully arrest the petitioner and his family members. The petitioner filed bail application seeking anticipatory bail before the District Courts, which came up for hearing on 15.09.2021. The said application was dismissed by the learned ASJ. Hence, the present bail application has been filed.

10. It has been submitted that the IO is illegally and unlawfully trying to arrest the petitioner and his family members without complying with Section 41A Cr.P.C. The custodial investigation is not necessary; there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top