PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Jitendra Kohli – Appellant
Versus
Controller of Patents – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present appeal under section 117A Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter “Act”) has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 12th June, 2020 passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs. Vide the said order, the Appellant’s application No.3290/Del/2005 has been rejected under Section 15 of the Act.
3. The background of the case is that the Appellant has filed a patent application titled ‘process for conducting electronic tendering on secured platform’ vide provisional application dated 7th December, 2005. The complete specification was, thereafter, filed by the Appellant on 7th December, 2006. However, the First Examination Report (hereinafter “FER”) was only issued by the Respondent 10 years later on 29th January, 2016 in which the grant of patent was objected on the ground of lack of novelty, and non-patentability under Sections 3(k), and 3(m) of the Act.
4. In response to the FER, the Appellant filed its reply on 28th January, 2017 and it was brought to the attention of the Assistant Controller that the claims have been amended to overcome the objections raised in the FER. Thereafter,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.