SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 631

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Amit @ Sonu Jaat - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
CRL.A. 692, 815, 892, 894, 897, 1053 of 2016
Decided On : 14-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sumeet Verma (DHCLSC) with Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP along with W/SI Madhu, P.S. Jaitpur

Point of Law : Offence of the accused is established beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of legal evidence and material on the record, he cannot be convicted for an offence. There is an initial presumption of innocence of the accused and the prosecution has to bring home the offence against the accused through reliable evidence.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 366/34/367(2)(g)/506 – Offence of Kidnapping, abducting or inducing woman to compel her marriage – Act done by several persons - Rape – Charged - Information was received at Police Control Room that a lady had been raped by many persons in a truck near Gas Plant - On receiving said information, police team reached on spot at Agra Canal Road near Indane Gas Plant - Enquiry was made from Prosecutrix/Complainant and her statement was recorded - In her statement, Prosecutrix/Complainant stated that she was a rag picker and used to come from to JJ Colony, for rag-picking. - Prosecutrix/Complainant boarded vehicle for going to Nehru Place - Vehicle was driven by one co-accused, while other coaccused was helper - After reaching Nehru Place, all passengers got down from Vehicle, took Prosecutrix/Complainant near CNG pump, Place, where Prosecutrix/Complainant was introduced and who shifted Prosecutrix/Complainant into a car forcibly by twisting her arms - Drove car and took her near a cinema hall at Nehru Place where Prosecutrix/Complainant was allegedly raped in car - Whether consent given by the prosecutrix to sexual intercourse is voluntary, or whether it is given under a misconception of fact.

Finding of the Court :

Fact that there are several contradictions in the version of prosecutrix as well as lack of independent witnesses, there is sufficient material on record in form of medical evidence and forensic report that incriminate appellants named herein - Court is left with no other option but to conclude that offence as alleged has been committed by appellants and same having been substantiated by medical evidence, accused as named above have been rightly convicted and sentenced by Trial Court.

Result : Appeals dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Dhari Singh, J.

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. The instant criminal appeals under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter “Cr.P.C.”) have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 16th March 2016 and order on sentence dated 11th April 2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Fast Track Court, Southeast District, Saket Court, New Delhi wherein the Appellants/Accused persons were convicted and sentenced.

2. Since the criminal appeals bearing number CRL.A.-692/16, CRL.A.-815/16, CRL.A.-892/16, CRL.A.-894/16, CRL.A.-897/16, and CRL.A.-1053/16 have arisen out of the same FIR, pertain to the same set of facts, and have been heard together, therefore the same are being decided by way of this common judgment.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3. The brief facts and circumstances that have led to the instant case are as under:

    (i) On 19th May 2012 at about 4:45 P.M., information was received at Police Control Room that a lady had been raped by many persons in a truck near Gas Plant, Kalindi Kunj. On receiving the said information, police team reached on the spot at Agra Canal Road near Indane Gas Plant. The enquiry was made from the Prosecutrix/Complainant and her statement was recorded. In her statement, the Prosecutrix/Complainant stated that she was a rag picker and used to come from Najafgarh to JJ Colony, Madanpur Kahdar for rag-picking.

(ii) On 18th May 2012 at about 9:00 P.M., Prosecutrix/Complainant boarded Gramin Sewa vehicle from Jalebi Chowk, Madanpur Khadar for going to Nehru Place. The Gramin Sewa vehicle was driven by one co-accused namely Lucky, while the other co-accused Tehna was the helper.

(iii) After reaching Nehru Place, all the passengers got down from the Vehicle, Tehna took the Prosecutrix/Complainant near CNG pump, Nehru Place, where the Prosecutrix/Complainant was introduced to Vicky @ Vijay and Satyajeet Biswas @ Satte, who shifted the Prosecutrix/Complainant into a car forcibly by twisting her arms. Vicky @ Vijay drove the car and took her near a cinema hall at Nehru Place where the Prosecutrix/Complainant was allegedly raped in the car by Satyajeet Biswas @ Satte.

(iv) Thereafter, the Prosecutrix/Complainant was taken into a room at JJ Colony, Khadar where co-accused Lucky, Vicky @ Vijay, Yasin Khan @ Tehana and Satyajeet Biswas @ Satte allegedly committed rape upon her. Vicky @ Vijay called the co-accused Uma Shankar and the Amit @Sonu Jaat who also committed rape upon the Prosecutrix/Complainant. The Prosecutrix/Complainant also complained about an act of sodomy committed upon her by Vicky @ Vijay.

(v) Thereafter, the Prosecutrix/Complainant was taken in the Gramin Sewa by three of the co-accused. Near the gas plant, Kalindi Kunj, the vehicle went out of order. The co-accused Vicky @ Vijay again committed rape upon the Prosecutrix/Complainant. All the accused persons left the Prosecutrix/ Complainant there and threatened her to kill if she disclosed about the alleged incident to anyone. The Prosecutrix/Complainant sought help from a truck driver Abhimanyu @ Bantu. However, Abhimanyu @ Bantu took the Prosecutrix/Complainant into the truck cabin and committed rape upon her.

(vi) On the statement of Prosecutrix/Complainant, the instant FIR bearing No. 166/2012 dated 19th May 2012 was registered in Police Station Jaitpur against the Appellants/Accused persons. The Prosecutrix/Complainant was medically examined in AIIMS Hospital, wherein injuries were found on her body and internal parts.

(vii) On 20th May 2012, Vicky @ Vijay, Lucky, Yasin Khan @ Tehana, Satyajeet Biswas @ Satte, Uma Shanker, Abhimanyu @ Bantu and Amit @ Sonu Jaat were arrested upon the identification by the Prosecutrix/Complainant.

4. After Investigation, Chargesheet dated 15th August 2012 was filed before the Court below against all the Appellants/Accused persons and vide order dated 9th October 2012, t

                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                            1
                                            2
                                            3
                                            4
                                            5
                                            6
                                            7
                                            8
                                            9
                                            10
                                            11
                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                            supreme today icon
                                            logo-black

                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                            qr

                                            Scan Me!

                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top