IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Raunak Chikara - Petitioner
Vs.
University Of Delhi Through Its Registrar & Ors. - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5663 of 2021 & CM APPL. 17658 of 2021
Decided On : 23-02-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Petitioner seeks improvement/correction of his results for 4th semester of B.A. (Hons.)(English) course in respondent - University – Petitioner’s result for 4th semester was computed in terms of notification - As far as intermediate semester students were concerned, notification provided for their assessment on basis of two parameters: (a) marks on basis of internal evaluation or assignment, and (b) marks on basis of performance in previous semester/term - Petitioner subsequently repeated two papers of 3rd semester alongwith his 5th semester examinations - Results were declared, whereby petitioner’s 3rd semester results improved from SGPA of 3.86 to 5.79 - He consequently sought re-computation of his 4th semester marks, arguing that notification required his improved performance in previous semester to be taken into account – Whether notification requires petitioner’s 4th semester marks to be re-computed on basis of a subsequent improvement in his 3rd semester marks.
Finding of the court: University gave affected students an opportunity to participate in a later examination to improve their scores, if they so wished - As candidates were being subjected to an entirely novel method of assessment under notification, which would not have been within their contemplation at all, provision of a remedial opportunity guarded against any prejudice being caused to them - Notification is clarificatory of fact that it applies to 4th semester students but does not add anything to support case of petitioner - Notification deals with belated submission of assignments, and notification also appears to reiterate contents of various prior notifications of University - These notifications do not take petitioner’s case any further - For reasons aforesaid, court finds no infirmity in decision of University to decline request of petitioner for re-computation of his 4th semester result.
Result: Writ petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks improvement/correction of his results for the 4th semester of the B.A. (Hons.)(English) course [hereinafter, “the course”] in the respondent No.1- University of Delhi [hereinafter, “the University”].
Facts
2. The petitioner joined the course in the year 2018. The duration of the course is three years, with each year comprising of two semesters. This writ petition concerns a notification dated 04.06.2020 [hereinafter, “the notification”], issued by the University in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The petitioner’s result for the 4th semester was computed in terms of the notification.
3. The writ petition, as originally filed, sought quashing of the notification. However, at the very first hearing, i.e. on 02.06.2021, it was noted that the petitioner’s contention was, in fact, based upon an interpretation of the notification which, according to him, entitled him to an improvement in his 4th semester results. The petitioner, therefore, sought leave to amend the writ petition, which was allowed by an order dated 11.06.2021. The writ petition, as amended, seeks the following reliefs:
“(1) Quashing the Order/Decision not to take/allow the improved/corrected/revised CGPA & SGPA of the Petitioner and the Candidate, which was issued by the Dean (Examination) of University of Delhi for academic session 20 19-20.
(2) Direct the Respondent No. 1 to correct 4th Semester SGPA to 6.535 from 5.57 on the improved 3rd Semester SGPA from 3.86 to 5.79 of Petitioner for the Courses for which the Petitioner applied.
(3) Direct the Respondent No. 1 to correct 2nd Year CGPA from 5.68 to 6.165 bases on improved SGPA of 3rd & 4th Semester for the Courses for which the Petitioner applied.
(4) Direct the Respondents to take/allow the improved/corrected/revised CGPA & SGPA of the Petitioner for the Courses for which the Petitioner applied.
(5) Pass any other or further Order or Orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of Justice and to meet the ends of Justice.”
4. Upon the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and consequent disruption in the normal functioning of the University, the University was required to adopt alternative mechanisms for assessment and promotion of its students. The notification sought to address this need. It concerns grading/results of the intermediate semester students for all courses in the University. The relevant extracts of the notification are as follows:-
“In view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic, it is notified hereby to all concerned that the Intermediate semester/term/year students shall be graded with adopting alternative mode for the same as conducting examinations for Intermediate Semester/Term/Year students (second semester/term/ Ist year and fourth semester/term/IInd year students) in the conventional mode i.e. pen and paper is not feasible as per the existing government norms of maintaining social distancing and safety and health of the students .The matter was intensively deliberated in the bodies i.e. 'Task Force constituted by the University in view of Covid-19 and the Working Group on Examinations, based on which it has been decided that as one-time measure, alternative mode of grading for promotion/results shall be adopted as per composite format for calculating the same for the Intermediate semester/term/year students for the academic session 2019-2020 so that students of university can take their career forward.
Students of intermediate semester/term/year. The grading to the students could be composite of 50% marks on the basis of the pattern of internal evaluation/assignment based evaluation adopted by the university/colleges/faculty/Centre wherever applicable and the remaining 50% marks can be awarded on the basis of performance in previous semester/term/year only.
For students of intermediate semester/term/year, having no previous performance i.e. having no marks in prev
W.B. Central School Service Commission vs. Abdul Halim
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.