MUKUL MUDGAL
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO. LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PATEL – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mukul Mudgal, J.
1. A chromatic monopoly in respect of red and white colours claimed by the plaintiff by virtue of the registration of its mark is the issue which arises in this application for interim relief which affects not only the large tooth paste market in India in particular but also the issue of exclusive rights to a particular colour scheme generally.
2. The plaintiff No. 1 Colgate Palmolive Co. Ltd. and plaintiff No. 2 Colgate-Palmolive (India) Limited have filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark and copyright, passing off, unfair competition, damages, rendition of accounts against the defendant No. 1, Director of Ajanta India Limited, and defendant No. 2, Ajanta India Limited.
3. The plaintiffs have averred that they are an undoubted international market leader in the tooth paste trade and the plaintiff No. 2 is manufacturing and marketing Colgate toothpaste in India since 1937. The core issue enumerated above arises in view of the fact that the plaintiffs had always marketed their product with the red carton and
Cadila Health Care Ltd. Vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2001) 5 SCC 73
Dr. G.N. Khajuria and others Vs. Delhi Development Authority and others
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Another Vs. B. Satyanarayana Rao (Dead) by LRs. and Others
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma Vs. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories
Ruston and Hornsby Ltd. Vs. The Zamindara Engineering Co. (1969) 2 SCC 727
State of Bihar Vs. Kalika Kuer @ Kalika Singh and Others
State of U.P. and Another Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and Another
The Corn Products Refining Co. Vs. Shangrila Food Products Ltd. AIR 1960 SC 142
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.