JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

The plaintiffs have sued for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from carrying on business under the mark "SATYA" or any other Mark/trading name identical or deceptively similar to the logo/label "SATYA" of the plaintiffs and for delivery of infringing stationary, hoardings, boards, printed material, dies, block etc. and for rendition of accounts and recovery of damages of Rs. 21,00,000/-. Summons of the suit and notice of the application for interim relief were issued to the defendant. The plaintiffs filed affidavit of service with proof of delivery of summons on the defendant. However, vide order dated 12.10.2012, fresh summons of the suit were issued to the defendant. Another affidavit of service together with report generated from the website of DHL Couriers was filed and on perusal whereof, the Joint Registrar was satisfied that the shipment had been delivered on 16.11.2012. None appeared for the defendant. Accordingly, the matter has been placed before this Bench for appropriate orders against the defendant. Today also none has appeared for the defendant. The counsel for the plaintiffs presses for interim injunction.

2. The plaintiffs