MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State (gnct) Of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral). - The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner seeking setting aside of the orders dated 01.09.2021 and 21.09.2021 passed by the learned ASJ, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby opportunity of the petitioner to cross-examine the witness Vinod Kumar Chauhan (PW-1) was closed and the application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall of the said witness dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially, both the father and the mother of the deceased were cited as prosecution witnesses, i.e., PW-1 and PW-2 respectively. To safeguard the interest of the petitioner so that the prosecution witnesses may not improve upon their case, a request was made to the Trial Court for an opportunity to cross-examine both the witnesses on one day. However, the petitioner's request was declined by the Trial Court vide the impugned orders and on 01.09.2021, only Vinod Kumar Chauhan (PW-1) was present and examined, whereas the mother of the deceased (PW-2) was not summoned on that day.
Learned counsel also submits that although an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking an opp
P. Sanjeeva Rao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported as (2012) 7 SCC 56
Mir Mohd.Omar and Others vs. State of West Bengal reported as (1989) 4 SCC 436
Rajeswar Prasad Misra vs. State of West Bengal and Another reported as 1966 (1) SCR 178
Rajendra Prasad vs. Narcotic Cell through its Officer in Charge
P. Sanjeeva Rao (Supra) and T. Nagappa vs. Y.R. Muralidhar (2008) 5 SCC 633
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.