IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Anju Jalaj Batra - Appellant
Versus
National E-assessment Centre Additional Joint Deputy Assistant Commissiner Of Income Tax Officer - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 6233 of 2021; C.M. No. 19732 of 2021, 19733 of 2021
Decided On : 08-07-2021
Violation of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act - Assessment Order - The court set aside the impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice due to violation of Section 144B of the Act, emphasizing the principles of natural justice. The respondent was given liberty to pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with the law, and the petitioner was given the liberty to challenge any action of the respondent in accordance with the law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the assessment order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Center, Delhi under Section 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2018-19, citing violation of principles of natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the assessment proceeding had been completed in violation of the principles of natural justice due to the violation of Section 144B of the Act.
Issues: Violation of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, principles of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court set aside the impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice due to the violation of Section 144B of the Act, emphasizing the principles of natural justice.
Final Decision: The impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice were set aside, and the respondent was given liberty to pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with the law. The petitioner was also given the liberty to challenge any action of the respondent in accordance with the law.
JUDGMENT
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging assessment order dated 22nd April, 2021 passed by respondent no.1-National Faceless Assessment Center, Delhi under Section 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short 'the Act'] for assessment year 2018-19. Petitioner seeks to restrain the respondent from giving effect to/proceeding further pursuant to the impugned order as well as demand notice and penalty notice dated 22nd April, 2021.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was issued Notice under Section 142(1) of the Act, to which the petitioner replied and furnished relevant details/explanations. He further states that despite the petitioner's replies, the respondent issued impugned assessment order without issuing a mandatory draft assessment order or a show cause notice to the petitioner.
4. He points out that in a similar case being Smart Vishwas Society vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Earlier National E-Assessment Centre Delhi) & Ors, WP(C) 5348/2021, the learned predecessor Division Bench of this Court had quashed the assessment order and consequential notices.
5. Issue Notice. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for respondent/revenue accepts notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/revenue states that the record presently placed before the Court would show that though no show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order was issued, yet several opportunities had been granted by the respondents/revenue to the petitioner, before the said date, to explain its case.
6. This argument of the respondent/revenue is contrary to the statutory scheme, as provided in Section 144B of the Act. The relevant portions of Section 144B xvi (a) and (b) as well as Section 144B(9) of the Act are reproduced hereinbelow:-
"144B. (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other provisions of this Act, the assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 or under section 144, in the cases referred to in sub-section (2), shall be made in a faceless manner as per the following procedure, namely:-.........
(xvi) the National Faceless Assessment Centre shall examine the draft assessment order in accordance with the risk management strategy specified by the Board, including by way of an automated examination tool, whereupon it may decide to-
(a) finalise the assessment, in case no variation prejudicial to the interest of assessee is proposed, as per the draft assessment order and serve a copy of such order and notice for initiating penalty proceedings, if any, to the assessee, along with the demand notice, specifying the sum payable by, or refund of any amount due to, the assessee on the basis of such assessment; or
(b) provide an opportunity to the assessee, in case any variation prejudicial to the interest of assessee is proposed, by serving a notice calling upon him to show cause as to why the proposed variation should not be made; or........
xxx xxx xxx
(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, assessment made under sub-section (3) of section 143 or under section 144 in the cases referred to in subsection (2) [other than the cases transferred undersub-section (8)], on or after the 1st day of April, 2021, shall be non est if such assessment is not made in accordance with the procedure laid down under this section."
(emphasis supplied)
7. In our opinion, learned counsel for the petitioner is correct in submitting that Section 144B of the Act has been violated and the assessment proceeding has been completed in the present case in violation of the principles of natural justice.
8. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 22nd April, 2021 issued under Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Act for the assessment year 2018-2019 as well as demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Act and notice for initiating penalty proceedings issued under Section 270A
Violation of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act and principles of natural justice.
The court reaffirmed that assessments must comply with statutory procedures to ensure natural justice, nullifying orders that do not adhere to the stipulated process outlined in Section 144B of the I....
Violation of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the principles of natural justice in the assessment proceeding.
Assessment orders must be issued in compliance with procedural requirements, including mandatory draft orders and show cause notices to uphold principles of natural justice.
Tax assessments must adhere to statutory procedures to uphold principles of natural justice, specifically the requirement for a draft assessment order as per Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.
Taxation - Show cause notice - Faceless assessment - No prior show cause notice as well as draft assessment order have been issued, there is a violation of principles of natural justice as well as ma....
The mandatory nature of the provisions under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) and 144B(9) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the consequences of non-compliance with the procedural requirements.
A writ petition is maintainable in cases of violation of natural justice, even when an appeal exists, especially concerning mandatory procedures outlined in statutory law.
Assessment orders issued without mandatory show-cause notice violate principles of natural justice, making them non est, despite the availability of an appellate remedy.
Violation of the principle of natural justice and mandatory procedure under the 'Faceless assessment Scheme' and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 renders the assessment order, demand notice, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.