SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1624

SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Meera Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Suhail Malik, Advocate, Rajiv Mishra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. -

CM APPLN. 5683/2021 (early hearing)

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Appeal is taken up for consideration today.

MAC.APP. 285/2020

1. The hearing was conducted through.

2. Appellant impugns judgment dated 21.01.2020 whereby the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has disposed of the Detailed Accident Report (DAR for short) and awarded compensation.

3. Before the Tribunal the Insurance Company had made an offer for settlement and had given a legal offer of Rs. 43,89,261/-, however, compensation awarded by the Tribunal is Rs. 79,10,592/-.

4. Tribunal has noticed that the accident had taken place between a commercial vehicle which hit a pedestrian who was crossing the road. The Tribunal has noticed that though a legal offer of Rs. 43,89,261/- was made, however, as per the computation made by the Tribunal as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court, compensation of Rs. 79,10,592/- was required to be awarded.

5. The DAR prima facie indicated that the vehicle was being driven in rash and negligent manner at a fast speed and in zigzag manner and hit the pedestrian causing his death.

6. Though the Insurance Company had taken a plea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top