JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral) - The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Appellant impugns judgment dated 30.07.2021 passed by the Railway Claim Tribunal, Principal Bench allowing the claim petition and awarding compensation to the claimant/injured.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Tribunal has erred in allowing the petition as there was no evidence adduced to show that any train accident had taken place. He submits that reliance has been placed on the admission and discharge summary of Raksha Hospital and Trauma Centre which itself mentions that the same is not to be used for medico-legal purposes. He further submits that the DRM report has concluded that there was no information regarding any incident and no evidence to suggest that any accident had taken place.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the statement recorded in the admission and discharge summary is also based on what had been informed to the doctor and the doctor has not concluded that any accident has taken place with a train and the recording is merely on the basis of what has been told to the doctor.

5. Subject claim petition was filed by the respondent