SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 156

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) Vi Fdi Three Pte. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 1(1)(2), Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2562 of 2022 & CM APPL. 7332 of 2022 (for stay)
Decided On : 30-01-2023

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Porus F. Kaka, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Vishal Kalra, Mr. S.S. Tomar and Mr. Divesh Chawla, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Senior Standing Counsel along with Mr. Tushar Gupta, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocate.

Headnote:

Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 147, (1), 143(1), (2), 148 to 153, 144C, 66(2), 90(4), 241A - Finance Act, 2013 - Tax residency certificate - Re-assessment - Whether respondent-revenue can go behind tax residency certificate issued by other tax jurisdiction and issue re-assessment notice under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 to determine issues of residence status, treaty eligibility and legal ownership - Held, Assessee, a non-resident, tried to expand its arguments to include that income earned was not taxable under treaty - Though accepting arguments, Court decided not to intervene in matter - Accordingly, this Court is of view that respondent-revenue cannot go behind TRC issued by other tax jurisdiction as same is sufficient evidence to claim treaty eligibility, residence status, legal ownership and accordingly there is no capital gain earned by petitioner liable to tax in India - Even clarificatory press release issued by Finance Ministry pursuant to 2013 amendment makes it clear that a TRC is to be accepted and tax authorities cannot go behind it - Further, since on basis of repeated assurances by Government of India which have been upheld by Apex Court, petitioner had invested in India, respondent is estopped from arguing to contrary - Court is of view that no income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in present case - In Indu Lata Rangwala (supra), this Court has held that reopening of assessment based on return of income must show 'reasons to believe' that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment – Ordered accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

MANMOHAN, J.

ISSUE

1. The core issue that arises for consideration in the present writ petition is whether the respondent-revenue can go behind the tax residency certificate issued by the other tax jurisdiction and issue re-assessment notice under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) to determine issues of residence status, treaty eligibility and legal ownership.

FACTS

2. The relevant facts of the present case are that during the Assessment Year 2014-15, the petitioner-Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) VI FDI Three Pte. Ltd. acquired equity shares of Agile Electric Sub Assembly Private Limited, a Company incorporated in India (“Agile”) in two tranches, i.e. on 16th August, 2013 and 31st October, 2013.

3. During the year under consideration, i.e. Assessment Year 2016-17, the petitioner sold all the equity shares of Agile to Igarashi Electric Works Limited (“Igarashi”) and other parties on 30th July, 2015.

4. The petitioner electronically filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29th September, 2016. In terms of the said return of income, the petitioner claimed that the gains earned by it on sale of Agile shares were not taxable in India by virtue of Article 13(4) the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement entered into and subsisting between India and Singapore (“India-Singapore DTAA”) based on the Tax Residency Certificate (‘TRC’). In its return of income, the petitioner made all the requisite disclosures with regard to the investment and sale of shares like the petitioner is a non-resident in India and majority of its Directors were residents of Singapore.

5. The petitioner’s return of income was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act with no demand, on 8th October, 2016.

6. On 31st March, 2021 a notice was issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The petitioner filed a return of income on 28th April, 2021 and vide letter dated 28th April, 2021 requested for the reasons. After eight months the reasons were supplied to the petitioner vide letter dated 02nd December, 2021. The ‘Reasons’ are reproduced hereinbelow:-

    “RECORDING OF REASONS FOR REOPENING THE CASE OF BLACKSTONE CAPITAL PARTNERS (SINGAPORE) VI FDI THREE PTE. LTD.,

A.Y. 2016-17 PAN: AAFCB5584L

1. Background:-

The assessee is a company and filed ITR for the AY 2016-17 at nil income. ITR was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act, however no scrutiny assessment was made in this case.

Subsequently vide letter F.No. ITO/Intl.Tax (2)(1)(1)/2020-21/88 dated 19.03.2021; following information was received from ITO, TDS, Ward 2(1)(1), lntl. Taxn., New Delhi related to the assessee.

2. Information received from the ITO, TDS, Ward 2(1)(1), Intl. Taxn., New Delhi

In the case of M/s Igarashi Electric Works Ltd., (PAN AABC16394M), verification u/s 133(6) of the act was made w.r.t. foreign remittances made during FY 2015-16. On perusal of the documents furnished by the assessee as well as the information available on ITBA portal, it is revealed that during the year under consideration M/s Igarashi Electric Works Ltd., (PAN AABC16394M) made total foreign remittance of Rs.4,01,31,77,340/-, to M/s Black Stone Capital Partners (Singapore) VI FDI Three PTE Ltd., stating nature of Payment as consideration paid for acquisition of Shares. Further, the reason for non-deduction of tax was explained that M/s Black Stone Capital Partners (Singapore) VI FDI Three PTE Ltd., is a resident of Singapore and as such not subject to tax in India on Sale of said shares as per the provisions of India-Singapore DTAA. As per submission of the assessee, M/s Black Stone Capital Partners (Singapore) VI FDI Three PTE Ltd., has sold the shares of M/s Agile Electric Sub Assembly Pvt Ltd., to M/s Igarashi Electric Works Ltd., for sale consi

                                                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                        1
                                                        2
                                                        3
                                                        4
                                                        5
                                                        6
                                                        7
                                                        8
                                                        9
                                                        10
                                                        11
                                                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                        supreme today icon
                                                        logo-black

                                                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                        Please visit our Training & Support
                                                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                        qr

                                                        Scan Me!

                                                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                        whatsapp-icon Back to top