SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2420

ANU MALHOTRA
Continental Metalloid Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Alluminium – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ajay Gulati and Puneet Singh, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Mohit Paul, Advocate (through VC), for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Pursuant to order dated 11.2.2021, the petitioners have placed on record the copy of the orders dated 7.11.2019, 5.12.2019, 29.1.2020 and 18.2.2020 in CC No. 471089/2016.

2. It appears that there is a typographical error in the order dated 11.2.2021 directing to the effect that the copy of order dated 19.10.2020 mentioned in order dated 19.12.2020 of the learned trial Court be placed on record in as much as the copy of the order dated 19.10.2020 was already on record at page 26 and the order that was requisite to be filed in terms of the mentioning thereof in order dated 19.12.2020 of the learned Trial Court was the order dated 18.2.2020, a copy of which has been placed on record now on behalf of the petitioner. The mention of the aspect that "it is considered essential that the copy of the order dated 19.10.2020 mentioned therein", is directed to be rectified in terms of Section 362 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 to the effect "it is considered essential that a copy of the order dated 18.2.2020 be placed on record".

3. Submissions have been made on behalf of either side.

4. The petitioners vide the present petition have sought the setting aside of the orders dated 19.10.2020 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top