2022 Supreme(Del) 2133
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Asha Menon, J.
Pappu Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1495 of 2022, Bail Appln. 1525 of 2022, Crl.M.A. 9657 of 2022 and Bail Appln. 1574 of 2022
Decided On : 31-08-2022
Unlawful access and disclosure of entrusted data constitutes criminal breach of trust, leading to wrongful loss.
Headnote:
Bail Application - Illegal Disclosure of Bank Records - Section 438 Cr.P.C. - Section 409, Section 34 IPC
Fact of the Case:
The case involved illegal disclosure and divulgence of bank records by bank officials, leading to loss of business for the complainant company. The accused filed bail applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused acted in concert to unlawfully access and disclose confidential information, causing wrongful loss to the complainant company. The court dismissed the bail applications, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation to unravel the conspiracy.
Issues: The issues revolved around the unlawful disclosure of bank records, conspiracy among the accused, and the requirement for custodial interrogation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the accused's actions constituted criminal breach of trust, as they unlawfully accessed and disclosed entrusted data, leading to wrongful loss. The court also highlighted the need for thorough interrogation to uncover the full extent of the conspiracy.
Final Decision: The court dismissed all bail applications, finding no merit for granting anticipatory bail to the applicants.
ORDER
1. This common order will dispose of the three applications being Bail Appln. 1495/2022, Bail Appln. 1525/2022, Bail Appln. 1574/2022 filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail. Since the applications have been filed by three of the accused persons in FIR No.351/2022 registered by the Model Town, Police Station under Section 409 read with Section 34 IPC, the three applications are being taken up together for disposal.
2. The complaint was filed on behalf of Cyber Root Risk Advisory Private Limited (complainant company) through its authorized representative, Mr. Chiranshu Ahuja regarding illegal disclosure and divulgence of their bank records and mishandling of their confidential and sensitive information by the bank which was the Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, JMD Regent Square branch, (Kotak Bank) where the complainant company maintained a current account bearing No.2511468461 along with other accounts for the last six years prior to the registration of the FIR. In June, 2020, the complainant company lost some projects from their existing clients due to pricing and other such issues which could only be revealed from one's bank account statements and other confidential data. On 17th June, 2020, the complainant company expressed their concern of illegal leakage, disclosure and divulgence to the bank employees being the accused No. 4 and 5. Reminders had to be issued to the Kotak Bank, who did not respond to the emails of the complainant company. It was only in September, 2020 that the complainant company received a phone call from the Service Relationship Manager from the Kotak Bank informing them that nothing conclusive could be found about the unauthorized access of bank statements/records. When information to this effect was sought in writing the Kotak Bank failed to provide any communication in writing.
3. Repeated requests and discussions with the accused Nos.3, 4 and 5 again did not result in any revelation to the complainant company as to how their confidential information could be revealed to third parties. The complainant company, therefore, suspected that the information was illegally disclosed and divulged by the bank officials only. It is further recorded in the FIR that the company's suspicions were confirmed when the statement of the complainant company's bank account was filed by a third party-i.e., the accused No.7 before the United States District Courts for the Middle District of North Carolina, USA. The accused No.7 had falsely represented before that court that the bank statements had been obtained from a `whistle-blower" who was employed by the complainant company and who had legitimate access to the company's bank account. Since the complainant company had not issued any instruction or request for generation of a bank statement for the period of 1st April, 2016 to 1st July, 2020, it was apparent to them that somebody else leaked the information with the aid and collusion with the Kotak Bank officials to provide illegal benefits to the accused No.7.
4. The complainant company on 8th February, 2021 then sent an email to the top management enclosing the leaked and divulged bank account statements asking for the identification of the culprits. The copy was also sent to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) when there was no action on the part of Kotak Bank. The Reserve Bank of India registered the complaint on 25th February, 2021 for the unauthorized and illegal disclosure of the bank account statements of the complainant company to third parties. Subsequently, on 3rd April, 2021, the complainant company received an email from the Ms. Preeti Puthran, Service Assurance Officer Nodal Office Correspondence, Kotak Bank admitting that an employee of the Kotak Bank had illegally accessed the bank accounts without any written instruction and that stern action had been taken against him and his services terminated with immediate effect. But no details were provided to the complainant company. The Bank