SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2051

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Tahir Hussain - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Director Enforcement Directorate - Respondent
Crl.Rev.P. 775 of 2022 and Crl.M.A. No. 23452 of 2022
Decided On : 24-11-2022

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4, 44; Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 307 - Criminal conspiracy and money laundering - Petitioner accused of facilitating and funding riots through fraudulent transactions linked to company accounts, using fake bills for financial gain - Extensive evidence, including witness statements and financial records, established petitioner's involvement in a larger conspiracy to incite riots by funding anti-CAA protests. (Paras 7.1, 40-62)

(B) Evidence - Role of obtained statements under Section 50 PMLA admissible in determining involvement in money laundering activities; such provisions do not violate constitutional protections. (Paras 39, 63)

Table of Content
1. court's jurisdiction and authority to proceed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the alleged money laundering activities. (Para 3 , 4)
3. evidence collected and witness statements. (Para 5 , 6)
4. charges filed due to prima facie evidence. (Para 7 , 8)
5. interconnections of fraudulent transactions indicate criminal intent. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner, Tahir Hussain, arrayed as accused No.1 in ECIR/05-STF/2020 submitted by the Directorate of Enforcement as a complaint under Sections 44 and 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (herein after referred to as the PMLA, 2002 for the alleged commission of the offence of Money Laundering as defined under Section 3 read with Section 70 punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA, 2002, seeks the setting aside of the order dated 3.11.2022 of the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, Shahdara, Karkardooma, in SC No. 181/2020; CNR No.-DLSH-01-00-6179-2020 Case No. ECIR/-05-STF/2020 titled Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Tahir Hussain, whereby the orders were passed for framing of charges against the petitioner under Section 3 of the PMLA, 2002 punishable under Section 4 of the said enactment.

2. The respondent, the Directorate of Enforcement, was present on advance notice of the petition and exhaustive oral submissions were made on behalf of either side. Pursuant to the directions dated 15.11.2022 the written submissions have also been submitted on behalf of either side.A catena of verdicts has been relied upon on behalf of either side in support of their rival contentions.

3. The brief facts of the case sought to be asserted by the Directorate of Enforcement against the petitioner are to the effect that:

FIR No. 88/2020 Police Station Dayalpur, under Sections 307/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, qua an occurrence on the date 25.2.2020 at around 3:50 P.M. was registered wherein the complainant Ajay Goswami stated that on 25.2.2020 he had come to the house of his uncle Rakesh Sharma and it was around 3:50 P.M. when he was going to his house at Khajuri and when he reached the corner of the gali he saw a crowd of persons throwing stones and firing bullets on the main road, Karawal Nagar and these persons were committing riots and on seeing them he (Ajay Goswami) started running towards the house of his uncle and then a bullet like thing forcelyhit his right buttock and the persons who were standing there informed that between Gali No. 5 and 6 persons named Gulfam and Tanveer were firing bullets continuously and people standing there asked him to go. inter alia, the complainant of this FIR stated that the person who picked him up had informed that many persons were firing bullets and throwing petrol bombs from the house of Tahir Hussain (the petitioner herein) and were throwing stones.

FIR No. 59/2020 Police Station Crime Branch under Sections 147/148/149/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered on a complaint of SI Arvind Kumar No. D-5708 who stated that a secret informer had informed him that the riots which took place in Delhi on the dates 23rd, 24th and 25th February, 2020,were a well-planned conspiracy hatched by a student Umar Khalid of the JNU and his companions who were connected with various organizations together and that Umar Khalid had given inciting speeches and made appeals to the people to block the public roads during the proposed visit of the President of America on 24.2.2020 and 25.2.2020 so that a propaganda could be spread at the International level during the travel of the President of America that atrocities were being committed on the minorities in India.

inter alia, it had been stated in this FIR that under this conspiracy at many houses at Mauzpur, Kardampuri, Jafrabad, Chandbagh, Gokalpuri and Shiv Vihar and the areas around the same, fire arms, petrol bombs, acid bombs, stones catapults to throw the same and other deadly weapons were collected and at different places, the ladies and children gathered





























































  • Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top