SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 686

YASHWANT VARMA
M. G. Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
Ratna Kapur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Petitioner in person.
Mr. Jayant Kumar Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sulabh Rewari, Ms. Mansi Binjrajka & Mr. Raghav Bhatia, Advs.

JUDGMENT :

(Yashwant Varma, J.) :—

1. This petition purporting to be under Section 301 and 302 of the Indian SUCCESSION ACT , 1925, [ SUCCESSION ACT ] has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:

    “(i) appoint an Administrator in respect of the estate of Late Shri R. K. P. Shankardass in terms of the provisions of Sections 301 and 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925;

    (ii) direct the Respondent No. 1 to render true and full accounts of the estate/properties of Late Shri R.K.P. Shankardass in her possession and control as well as distribution thereof including the immovable property(ies) other than those listed in Schedule ‘A’ to ‘D’ herein;

    (iii) direct the Respondent No. 1 to deposit all the amounts received from the estate of Late Shri R.K.P. Shankardass either as nominee or beneficiary in the Executor Account bearing No. 50100157899116 held with HDFC Bank, New Friends Colony, New Delhi - 110065.

    (iv) to pass any other appropriate order/direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

2. The petition itself emanates from certain disput

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top