MINI PUSHKARNA
Gopal Krishan Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Land & Building Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]
Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the purported letter dated 09.01.2012 issued by Land and Building Department, by which the Land and Building Department had directed the DDA to keep in abeyance the recommendation for allotment of alternative plot to the petitioner. Earlier, the Land and Building Department had recommended allotment of alternative plot to the petitioner by way of Recommendation Letter dated 02.07.2004 under the Allotment of plot under the Scheme of Large Scale Acquisition, Development and Disposal of Land in Delhi, 1961.
2. The facts in brief are that the land of the father of the petitioner forming part of Khasra No. 1281/873/3/1, total land measuring 5 bighas 1 biswas situated in the Revenue estate of village Bahapur, Delhi, was acquired vide award No. 1299. Pursuant thereto, possession of the land was also taken over. The father of the petitioner applied for allotment of an alternative plot as per the rehabilitation policy of the respondent.
3. Father of the petitioner died on 22.02.2003 and after his death, the petitioner pursued the matter with the respondent. Ul
The court emphasized the importance of considering the documents submitted by the petitioner and granting them an opportunity of hearing in the case of allotment of an alternative plot.
The main legal point established is that applications for alternative plot allotment made in line with the respondent's advice and within the specified time should not be rejected based on limitation....
The court's decision emphasized the need to consider ancestral property in extended abadi areas and directed the respondent authority to reconsider the case for alternate allotment of land.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot was allowed based on the finding that the petitioner's land was acquired completely, and the co....
The failure of the DDA to process the property conversion request due to unsubstantiated claims of fraud and lack of documentation violates the respondent's rights.
The court emphasized the right to be heard and the consideration of requisite documents in the process of alternative land allotment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner afresh on the basis of the documents filed by the petitioner in the ....
Failure to take necessary legal steps can result in the disposal of a petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.