RAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJU
PC Commissioner of Income Tax - 20 – Appellant
Versus
Fish Poultry And Egg Marketing Committee – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral):
CM No.6063/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 331 days in re-filing the appeal]
1. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal.
1.1. According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 331 days.
2. For the reasons given in the application, the delay is condoned.
3. The application is, accordingly, disposed of.
ITA 72/2023
4. This is an appeal preferred against the order dated 31.05.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"]. The appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13.
5. The short point, even according to Mr Zoheb Hossain, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, is whether the income received by way of fee by the respondent/assessee, is amenable to deduction under Section 10(26AAB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "1961 Act"].
6. The facts which have emerged from the record [and which are not in dispute], are the following:
(i) The respondent/assessee had filed its return on 29.09.2012 declaring a loss of Rs.2,23,585/- after
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.