SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1192

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Aviral Education Welfare And Cultural Society & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Delhi Public School Society – Respondent
W.P.(C) 8219 of 2020 & CM APPLs. 26629 of 2020 (seeking interim directions), 10847 of 2023 (seeking impleadment of a group of students studying in DPS Sahibabad, UP) and 10848 of 2023 (seeking impleadment of CBSE)
Decided On : 10-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Gupta, Mr. Sparsh Aggarwal and Ms. Paridhi Bisht, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sakshi Mendiratta, and Mr. Siddharth Saxena, Advocates, for the Respondent.
Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with briefing counsel (appearance not given), for the Applicants in CM APPL. 10847-10848/2023.

The termination of a contract without assigning reasons is binding as per the terms of the contract. Private parties performing public functions may not be subject to the writ jurisdiction of the court in contractual disputes.

Headnote:

Joint Venture Agreement - Termination - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - [Clause 13, Clause 8(i), Clause 13, Clause 14] - The court analyzed the termination of a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) and its clauses, finding that the termination without assigning reasons was binding as per the JVA. The court also considered the public function of the Delhi Public School Society (DPSS) and its impact on the students, ultimately dismissing the petition and directing DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the termination of a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) between Aviral Education Welfare and Cultural Society (AEWCS) and Delhi Public School Society (DPSS) for establishing a school. AEWCS sought to annul the termination notice and declare certain clauses of the JVA as unconstitutional. DPSS opposed the petition's maintainability and filed a Trademark and Copyright infringement case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the termination without assigning reasons was binding as per the JVA. It also determined that DPSS, while performing a public function, was not subject to the writ jurisdiction of the court in this case. The court dismissed the petition and directed DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.

Issues: The issues revolved around the termination of the JVA, the public function of DPSS, and the impact on the students. The court also considered the maintainability of the petition and the validity of the termination notice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the termination without assigning reasons was binding as per the JVA. It also determined that DPSS, while performing a public function, was not subject to the writ jurisdiction of the court in this case. The court dismissed the petition and directed DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition and directed DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The instant case revolves around a contentious termination of a Joint Venture Agreement between two educational entities, which has led to disputes over unauthorized trademarks and copyright usage and enforceability of contractual clauses. Briefly put, a Joint Venture Agreement ["JVA"], was executed between Aviral Education Welfare and Cultural Society [Petitioner No. 1 - hereinafter "AEWCS"] and Delhi Public School Society [Respondent - hereinafter "DPSS"], with the aim to establish an English Medium School in Village Teela Shahbazpur, Tehsil Loni, District Ghaziabad. Despite termination of the JVA shortly after its execution, AEWCS continues to operate the `Delhi Public School, Sahibabad' [hereinafter "school"] as a DPSS affiliated school, using DPS name and logos. AEWCS, along with some students enrolled in the school [hereinafter collectively "Petitioners"], have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court to annul the termination notice on the ground of arbitrariness and to declare some of the clauses of JVA as unconstitutional. DPSS vehemently opposes petition's maintainability and have also filed a Trademark and Copyright infringement case that is being listed and heard concurrently.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. On 10th October, 2016, AEWCS entered into a JVA with DPSS for establishing a school under the name and style of `Delhi Public School'. It was agreed inter se parties that the school would be run, managed, and administered through a `Board of Management', which comprised of persons belonging to DPSS. The right to constitute the `Management Committee', `Selection Committee' and `Staff Members' vested exclusively with DPSS. AEWCS was required to incur expenditure and investment for establishing the school. On signing, AEWCS were charged INR 25 lakhs and vide a separate letter, INR 10 lakhs were charged from them towards education assistance to students and faculty of the school. They acquired land by taking a loan from Punjab National Bank and then constructed the school building thereon. Recognition was granted to the school by the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 05th July, 2018. Shortly thereafter, on 31st August, 2018, AEWCS requested DPSS to constitute the Selection Committee, in order to formalise ad hoc appointment(s) and facilitate the process for CBSE affiliation. Subsequently, CBSE affiliation was also granted to the school. AEWCS thereafter vide e-mail dated 31st August, 2018 informed DPSS that 83 students were studying in the school and steps have been taken towards opening of admission for academic session 2019-20.

3. At this juncture, DPSS invoked Clause 13 of the said agreement and vide notice dated 24th September, 2019, terminated the JVA without assigning any reason(s).

4. Aggrieved with the abrupt termination of JVA, AEWCS invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In the said petition [O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 98/2019], parties were referred to mediation. Unfortunately, amicable resolution of disputes was unsuccessful. In the interregnum, on account of restricted court functioning, proceedings in Section 9 Petition were postponed. In October 2020, AEWCS, filed the instant writ petition contending that this is a more efficacious remedy for agitating their grievances. Simultaneously, they withdrew the Section 9 Petition.

5. On 21st October, 2020, notice was issued in the instant writ petition, but no interim order was passed. Relevant portion of the said order is culled out below:

    "2. Petitioner No.1 entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (in short `JVA') with the respondent whereby the parties agreed that the school will be run under the name and style of `Delhi Public School' and will be administered by a Board of Management which shall be constituted by the respondent Society. It is stated that for the school petitioner No.1 has spent large amount i.e. total project cost of Rs.44.37 crores and project land measuring 9 acres and has commenced the school. The S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top