IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Aviral Education Welfare And Cultural Society & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Delhi Public School Society – Respondent
W.P.(C) 8219 of 2020 & CM APPLs. 26629 of 2020 (seeking interim directions), 10847 of 2023 (seeking impleadment of a group of students studying in DPS Sahibabad, UP) and 10848 of 2023 (seeking impleadment of CBSE)
Decided On : 10-03-2023
Joint Venture Agreement - Termination - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - [Clause 13, Clause 8(i), Clause 13, Clause 14] - The court analyzed the termination of a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) and its clauses, finding that the termination without assigning reasons was binding as per the JVA. The court also considered the public function of the Delhi Public School Society (DPSS) and its impact on the students, ultimately dismissing the petition and directing DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the termination of a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) between Aviral Education Welfare and Cultural Society (AEWCS) and Delhi Public School Society (DPSS) for establishing a school. AEWCS sought to annul the termination notice and declare certain clauses of the JVA as unconstitutional. DPSS opposed the petition's maintainability and filed a Trademark and Copyright infringement case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the termination without assigning reasons was binding as per the JVA. It also determined that DPSS, while performing a public function, was not subject to the writ jurisdiction of the court in this case. The court dismissed the petition and directed DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.
Issues: The issues revolved around the termination of the JVA, the public function of DPSS, and the impact on the students. The court also considered the maintainability of the petition and the validity of the termination notice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the termination without assigning reasons was binding as per the JVA. It also determined that DPSS, while performing a public function, was not subject to the writ jurisdiction of the court in this case. The court dismissed the petition and directed DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition and directed DPSS to issue publications informing the public about the school's disassociation from DPSS.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The instant case revolves around a contentious termination of a Joint Venture Agreement between two educational entities, which has led to disputes over unauthorized trademarks and copyright usage and enforceability of contractual clauses. Briefly put, a Joint Venture Agreement ["JVA"], was executed between Aviral Education Welfare and Cultural Society [Petitioner No. 1 - hereinafter "AEWCS"] and Delhi Public School Society [Respondent - hereinafter "DPSS"], with the aim to establish an English Medium School in Village Teela Shahbazpur, Tehsil Loni, District Ghaziabad. Despite termination of the JVA shortly after its execution, AEWCS continues to operate the `Delhi Public School, Sahibabad' [hereinafter "school"] as a DPSS affiliated school, using DPS name and logos. AEWCS, along with some students enrolled in the school [hereinafter collectively "Petitioners"], have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court to annul the termination notice on the ground of arbitrariness and to declare some of the clauses of JVA as unconstitutional. DPSS vehemently opposes petition's maintainability and have also filed a Trademark and Copyright infringement case that is being listed and heard concurrently.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. On 10th October, 2016, AEWCS entered into a JVA with DPSS for establishing a school under the name and style of `Delhi Public School'. It was agreed inter se parties that the school would be run, managed, and administered through a `Board of Management', which comprised of persons belonging to DPSS. The right to constitute the `Management Committee', `Selection Committee' and `Staff Members' vested exclusively with DPSS. AEWCS was required to incur expenditure and investment for establishing the school. On signing, AEWCS were charged INR 25 lakhs and vide a separate letter, INR 10 lakhs were charged from them towards education assistance to students and faculty of the school. They acquired land by taking a loan from Punjab National Bank and then constructed the school building thereon. Recognition was granted to the school by the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 05th July, 2018. Shortly thereafter, on 31st August, 2018, AEWCS requested DPSS to constitute the Selection Committee, in order to formalise ad hoc appointment(s) and facilitate the process for CBSE affiliation. Subsequently, CBSE affiliation was also granted to the school. AEWCS thereafter vide e-mail dated 31st August, 2018 informed DPSS that 83 students were studying in the school and steps have been taken towards opening of admission for academic session 2019-20.
3. At this juncture, DPSS invoked Clause 13 of the said agreement and vide notice dated 24th September, 2019, terminated the JVA without assigning any reason(s).
4. Aggrieved with the abrupt termination of JVA, AEWCS invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In the said petition [O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 98/2019], parties were referred to mediation. Unfortunately, amicable resolution of disputes was unsuccessful. In the interregnum, on account of restricted court functioning, proceedings in Section 9 Petition were postponed. In October 2020, AEWCS, filed the instant writ petition contending that this is a more efficacious remedy for agitating their grievances. Simultaneously, they withdrew the Section 9 Petition.
5. On 21st October, 2020, notice was issued in the instant writ petition, but no interim order was passed. Relevant portion of the said order is culled out below:
"2. Petitioner No.1 entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (in short `JVA') with the respondent whereby the parties agreed that the school will be run under the name and style of `Delhi Public School' and will be administered by a Board of Management which shall be constituted by the respondent Society. It is stated that for the school petitioner No.1 has spent large amount i.e. total project cost of Rs.44.37 crores and project land measuring 9 acres and has commenced the school. The S
Andi Mukta Sadguru Trust and Ors. v. V.R. Rudani and Ors.
Binni Ltd. and Anr. v. V. Sadasivan and Ors.
Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University and Ors.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Ors.
State of Gujarat and Ors. v. Meghji Pethraj Shah Charitable Trust and Ors.
Matter pertains to the internal affairs of an unaided Non-Government Educational Institution, a writ petition would not be maintainable against the unaided private Institution, as an alternative reme....
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against a private unaided minority educational institution. A service dispute in the private realm involving a priva....
The Army Welfare Education Society is not a 'State' under Article 12, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply to private employment disputes.
Writ petition challenging termination from a private school not maintainable unless it is shown to perform public functions under Article 12 of the Constitution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against a private unaided minority institution for service dis....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks and the enforcement of injunctions to prevent trademark infringement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of a public law element in the termination of employment renders a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India no....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.