VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Ajay Kumar Jindal Prop. of M/s A. S. Fastener – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent, Ward 71, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 31.10.2022 passed by respondent no.3 [the Joint Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST), Appeals-I, Delhi - hereafter `the Appellate Authority'], whereby the petitioner's appeal against an order dated 22.02.2022 passed by respondent no.2 [the Deputy Commissioner, Ward 71, CGST Delhi - hereafter `the Adjudicating Authority'], was rejected.
2. By the order dated 22.02.2022, respondent no.2 had rejected, the petitioner's application seeking restoration of his Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration, which was canceled ab-initio.
3. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 09.03.2022 passed by respondent no.2, rejecting the petitioner's claim for input tax credit (hereafter `ITC') of Rs.24,91,347/- (Twenty Four Lakh Ninety One Thousand Three Hundred And Forty Seven Rupees). The petitioner's claim for refund of ITC was rejected because the petitioner was found to be non-existent and non-functional at the registered place of business. The said order is also inextricably linked with the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration.
4. The petitioner is, essentially, ag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.