MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Delhi Jal Board – Appellant
Versus
Hanuman Construction Co. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 151 CPC, the appellant seeks setting aside of the judgment dated 18.11.2017 in ARB 32/2017 whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 39 Rule 3 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the petition came to be dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant while assailing the impugned order contended that the trial court failed to appreciate the facts and the explanation provided in the application and passed the impugned order on mere technicalities.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, has contended that not only there was delay of 287 days in re-filing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act even the present appeal is filed after a delay of nearly 327 days.
4. A perusal of the records would show that the respondent had filed a claim wherein it was awarded a work of replacement of undersized sewers in Model Town, Delhi, Civil Line Zone vide Award dated 25.10.2002. The said work was to star
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.