SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4156

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Dinesh Kumar Sharma, JJ.
Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Trust – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 3535 of 2021 & CM APPL. 10693 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 3556 of 2021 & CM APPL. 10749 of 2021 etc.
Decided On : 26-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Tushar Mehta, SG with Mr.Balbir Singh, ASG and Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing Counsel, Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Mr.Sanjeev Menon, Mr.Prasanjeet Mohapatra, Mr.Shyam Gopal, Mr.Vivek Gurnani and Ms.Monica Benjimin, Advocates, for the Respondent.
Mr.Amar Dave, Advocate with Mr.Vivek Jain and Mr.Abhinav Jain, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6921/2021 & CM APPLs. 21839-21841/2021, 2285322854/2021 AND 25581/2021, Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Kavita Jha, Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr.Anant Mann, Advocates, for the Petitioner in all other Petitions.

The power of transfer under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not in any manner trammelled upon or negated by the two Notifications each dated 12th September, 2019 and 13th August, 2020.

Headnote:

The primary issue that arises for consideration in the present batch of writ petitions is whether the assessments of the petitioners could be transferred to the Central Circle by way of the impugned orders passed under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter be referred to as `the Act') without sanction of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (`CBDT').

Fact of the Case:

The present batch of writ petitions has been preferred by five Charitable trusts viz. Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Trust, Jawahar Bhawan Trust, Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust, Young India as well as three individuals viz. Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, Mrs. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and a political party -Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the power of transfer under Section 127 of the Act is not in any manner trammelled upon or negated by the two Notifications each dated 12th September, 2019 and 13th August, 2020. The Court also held that no assessee has any fundamental or vested legal right to be assessed by a Faceless Assessing Officer by virtue of amendment of Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act.

Issues: 1. Whether the assessments of the petitioners could be transferred to the Central Circle by way of the impugned orders passed under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter be referred to as `the Act') without sanction of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (`CBDT').

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The power of transfer under Section 127 of the Act is not in any manner trammelled upon or negated by the two Notifications each dated 12th September, 2019 and 13th August, 2020. 2. No assessee has any fundamental or vested legal right to be assessed by a Faceless Assessing Officer by virtue of amendment of Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the present writ petitions along with pending applications, without any order as to costs and the interim orders passed by this Court stand vacated.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Para Nos.
THE ISSUE1
RELEVANT FACTS2-4.12
ARGUMENTS BY LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL FOR GANDHIS AND FIVE CHARITABLE TRUSTS5-18
ARGUMENTS BY LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE AAM ADMI PARTY19-26
ARGUMENTS BY LEARNED SOLICITOR GENERAL AND LEARNED ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL27-41
COURT'S REASONING42-68
Constitution Bench in Kashiram Aggarwalla (supra) has authoritatively interpreted as well as outlined the scope and ambit of Section 127 of the Act42-45
Central Circle jurisdiction is not confined to search cases46
Power under Section 127 of the Act is in no manner trammelled upon or negated by the two notifications each dated 12th September, 2019 and 13th August, 202047-58
Reliance placed by petitioners upon the guidelines dated 17th September, 2020 is misplaced59
No assessee has any fundamental or vested legal right to be assessed by a faceless assessing officer by virtue of amendment of Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B)60-62
Undoubtedly, there can be no `guilt by association' or `guilt, due to relationship', yet in the present matters the assessments have been transferred for the purposes of coordinated investigation63-65
The argument that the power of transfer under the notifications is a two-step process is untenable in law66-67
CONCLUSION68

THE ISSUE

1. The primary issue that arises for consideration in the present batch of writ petitions is whether the assessments of the petitioners could be transferred to the Central Circle by way of the impugned orders passed under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter be referred to as `the Act') without sanction of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (`CBDT').

RELEVANT FACTS

2. It is pertinent to mention that the present batch of writ petitions has been preferred by five Charitable trusts viz. Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Trust, Jawahar Bhawan Trust, Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust, Young India as well as three individuals viz. Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, Mrs. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and a political party -Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).

3. In the present batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the transfer orders passed under Section 127 of the Act, whereby the jurisdiction of the petitioners have been transferred from Exemption Circle (in cases of Trusts) and ACIT Circle 52(1) (in cases of individuals) to DCIT Central Circle-27 and in the case of Aam Aadmi Party from Exemption Circle to DCIT, Central Circle -03. All the Income Tax Officers i.e. both transferor and transferee are located within the same city, namely, Delhi.

4. Since a common question of law arises in the present batch of writ petitions, the facts of Writ Petition (C) 3535 of 2021 (which was treated as the lead writ petition with the consent of parties) are reproduced hereinbelow.

4.1. The Petitioner (Sanjay Gandhi Trust) was established with the intent of providing health services, education and employment to the people of rural Uttar Pradesh. The Trust manages rural medical centre, the Sanjay Gandhi Hospital, educational institutes such as Indira Gandhi School and College of Nursing, Indira Gandhi Institute of Paramedical Sciences, Indira Gandhi Technical Institute and Rajiv Gandhi Computer Shiksha Kendra.

4.2. The petitioner is registered as a charitable institution under Section 12A of the Act and assessments have been completed under Section 143(3)/143(1) of the Act till the Assessment Year 2017-18. Charitable purpose of the petitioner has never been doubted by the revenue till the said Assessment Year.

4.3. By way of Finance Act, 2018, the concept of E-assessment was introduced in the Act by insertion of sub-Sections (3A), (3B) and (3C) to Section 143 of the Act and the Central Government was delegated with the power to make and notify a Scheme for conducting of E-assessments. Sub- Sections (3A), (3B) and (3C) to Section 143 of the Act are reproduced hereinbelow:

"Assessment 143...

(3A) The Central Government may make a scheme, by notification in the Official Gazette













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top