MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Trust – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Para Nos. | |
| THE ISSUE | 1 |
| RELEVANT FACTS | 2-4.12 |
| ARGUMENTS BY LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL FOR GANDHIS AND FIVE CHARITABLE TRUSTS | 5-18 |
| ARGUMENTS BY LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE AAM ADMI PARTY | 19-26 |
| ARGUMENTS BY LEARNED SOLICITOR GENERAL AND LEARNED ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL | 27-41 |
| COURT'S REASONING | 42-68 |
| Constitution Bench in Kashiram Aggarwalla (supra) has authoritatively interpreted as well as outlined the scope and ambit of Section 127 of the Act | 42-45 |
| Central Circle jurisdiction is not confined to search cases | 46 |
| Power under Section 127 of the Act is in no manner trammelled upon or negated by the two notifications each dated 12th September, 2019 and 13th August, 2020 | 47-58 |
| Reliance placed by petitioners upon the guidelines dated 17th September, 2020 is misplaced | 59 |
| No assessee has any fundamental or vested legal right to be assessed by a faceless assessing officer by virtue of amendment of Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) | 60-62 |
| Undoubtedly, there can be no `guilt by association' or `guilt, due to relationship', yet in the present matters the assessments have been transferred for the purposes of coordinated investigation | 63-65 |
| The argument that the power of transfer under the notific | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.