NAVIN CHAWLA
Geeta Anand – Appellant
Versus
Tanya Arjun – Respondent
JUDGMENT
I.A. 606/2023
1. The present application has been filed by the defendant no.1 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC') seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute raised in the plaint lies with the Family Court in terms of Section 7(1) Explanation (d) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as `Family Courts Act').
CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF
2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff, who is the mother-in-law of the defendant no.1 and the mother of the defendant no.2, praying for the following reliefs:
"a. Pass a decree of Permanent Injunction in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant No. 1 her relatives, agents, associates and/or employees thereby restraining them from visiting or entering the Suit Property at No. 26, Anand Lok, New Delhi-110049 and interfering in the peaceful life of the Plaintiff,
b. Award the cost of the present suit in favor of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants."
3. It is the case of the plaintiff that she, along with her Company AG Industries Pvt. Ltd., acquired the Suit Property bearing no. 26, Anand Lok, New De
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.