SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1266

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Himanshu Srivastava & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 2753 of 2019
Decided On : 05-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kabir S. Ghosh, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate, for the Respondent-1 to 4.
Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advocates, for the Respondent-5.

The decision on the grant of the benefit of the enhanced ceiling in the Gratuity has to be taken in the first instance by the concerned CPSE since it relates to affordability, and the CPSE must consider the financials and make a decision. The effective date of enhanced gratuity and the coverage of the employees under the Notification must be determined in accordance with the relevant O.M. and Notification.

Headnote:

Gratuity - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 4(3), O.M. dated 03.08.2017, O.M. dated 10.07.2018, Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2018 - [W.P.(C) 2753/2019] - [1972 Act, Section 4(3), O.M. dated 03.08.2017, O.M. dated 10.07.2018, Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2018] - The court examined the issue of enhanced gratuity payment to employees of a CPSE and emphasized the need for the concerned CPSE to consider the affordability of the enhanced gratuity based on the financial statements before making a decision. The court also highlighted the applicability of the O.M. dated 03.08.2017 and the Notification dated 29.03.2018 in determining the effective date of enhanced gratuity and the coverage of the employees under the Notification.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petition was filed by the Petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Respondents to extend the benefit of enhanced gratuity amount to the Petitioners who retired on or after 01.01.2017 as per the O.M. dated 03.08.2017 and to release the remaining gratuity amount lying with the Respondents as per the increased gratuity amount of Rs.20 lakhs to the Petitioners.

Finding of the Court:

The court emphasized the need for the concerned CPSE to consider the affordability of the enhanced gratuity based on the financial statements before making a decision. It also highlighted the applicability of the O.M. dated 03.08.2017 and the Notification dated 29.03.2018 in determining the effective date of enhanced gratuity and the coverage of the employees under the Notification.

Issues: The main issue was the entitlement of the Petitioners to the enhanced gratuity amount as per the O.M. dated 03.08.2017 and the Notification dated 29.03.2018, and the affordability of the CPSE to pay the enhanced gratuity based on its financial statements.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision on the grant of the benefit of the enhanced ceiling in the Gratuity has to be taken in the first instance by the concerned CPSE since it relates to affordability. The court refrained from forming any final opinion and emphasized the need for the CPSE to consider the financials and make a decision. The court also clarified the applicability of the O.M. dated 03.08.2017 and the Notification dated 29.03.2018 in determining the effective date of enhanced gratuity and the coverage of the employees under the Notification.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the court directing the concerned CPSE to consider the issue of payment of enhanced gratuity keeping in mind the financials for the relevant period and to assess if the payment of enhanced gratuity would lead to an additional outgo to exceed 20% of the average PBT. If the Board of Directors of the CPSE deems the enhanced gratuity affordable, necessary payments shall be made to the Petitioners. However, if the decision is against the enhancement, a reasoned and speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the Petitioners who shall be at liberty to take legal remedies.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

C.M. APPL. 2467/2023

1. Present application has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioners seeking condonation of delay of 135 days in filing the rejoinder.

2. Issue notice.

3. Ms. Anjana Gosain, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondents No. 1 to 4.

4. Mr. Puneet Taneja, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 5.

5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

6. Delay of 135 days in filing the rejoinder is condoned.

7. Rejoinder is taken on record.

8. Another copy of the rejoinder has been handed over to learned counsel for Respondent No. 5 during the course of hearing.

9. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2753/2019

10. Present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners seeking the following reliefs:

    "I. Issue a writ of mandamus thereby directing the Respondents herein to extend the benefit of enhanced gratuity amount to the Petitioners who have retired on or after 01.01.2017 as per O.M. No. W-02/0028/2017-DPE(WC)-GL-XIII/17 dated 03.08.2017 issued by the Min. of Heavy Industries &Public Enterprises (Dept. Of Public Enterprises) and quash the Office Order No. 477/2018 dated 22.05.2018 issued by the Respondent No. 5; and

    II. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to release the remaining gratuity amount lying with the Respondents as per the increased gratuity amount of Rs.20 lakhs to the Petitioners herein;"

11. Factual score emerging from the narrative in the writ petition is that Petitioners joined the services of Respondent No. 5/Pawan Hans Limited between the years 1986 to 1989 and after serving for several decades, without a blemish in service, retired on various dates between 01.01.2017 to 28.02.2018. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the `1972 Act') was enacted on 16.09.1972 as a welfare legislation and envisages payment of lump sum amount to an employee at the time of retirement in view of the years of service rendered by the employee with the concerned employer/establishment. Under Section 4(3) of 1972 Act, the amount of Gratuity is to be paid as per the ceiling limit notified from time to time by the Central Government.

12. Respondent No. 5 is a Mini Ratna-I category Central Public Sector Undertaking under the administrative control of Ministry of Civil Aviation/Respondent No. 1. It was incorporated on 15.10.1985 as the Helicopter Corporation of India with the objective of providing helicopter support services to oil sectors for offshore exploration operations, services in remote areas and charter services for tourism promotion. The 1972 Act admittedly applies to employees of Respondent No. 5. On 24.05.2010, the 1972 Act was amended by the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2010 and the limit of Gratuity payable was enhanced from Rs.3.5 lakhs to Rs.10 lakhs w.e.f. 24.05.2010.

13. On 19.11.2015, Report of the 7th CPC was submitted to the Central Government wherein number of recommendations were made with regard to the pay structures, retiral benefits etc. of the Central Government employees. In line with the recommendations, the Central Government decided to review and revise the existing structure of salary and emoluments of employees working as Executives in various Central Public Sector Enterprises (`CPSEs') and in this view, appointed 3rd Pay Revision Committee (PRC) on 09.06.2016 headed by Justice Satish Chandra (Retd.) to consider the 7th CPC recommendations.

14. Government of India issued an O.M. dated 04.08.2016 vide which various modifications were made qua Central Government employees governed by CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, whereby inter alia Gratuity limit was enhanced from Rs.10 lakhs to Rs.20 lakhs retrospectively w.e.f. 01.01.2016. On 21.11.2016, the 3rd PRC submitted its report to the Central Government i.e. Department of Public Enterprises, Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises and in view of the report, Government issued O.M. dated 03.08.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top