SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5256

MUKTA GUPTA, POONAM A. BAMBA
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate through VC, for the Appellant in CRL.A. 1180/2018.
Appellant in JC through VC in CRL.A. 1180/2018.
Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP, for State with Insp. Josepha Kujoor, CAW Cell/SW in CRL.A. 1180/2018.
Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Mr. Jasmeet S. Chadha, Mr. Prasanna, Mr. Udit Bakshi, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Ujwal Gahi, Ms Saumya and Mr. Gurjass Puri, Advocates, for the Petitioner in CRL.A. 1167/2018.
Appellant in person in CRL.A. 1167/2018. Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP, for State with Insp. Josepha Kujoor, CAW Cell/SW in CRL.A. 1167/2018.
Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Mr. Jasmeet S. Chadha, Mr. Prasanna, Mr. Udit Bakshi, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Ujwal Gahi, Ms Saumya and Mr. Gurjass Puri, Advocates, for the Petitioner in CRL.A. 1166/2018.
Represented by: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP, for State with Insp. Josepha Kujoor, CAW Cell/SW in CRL.A. 1166/2018.

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J.

1. By these appeals, the appellants challenge the common impugned judgment of the learned Trial Court dated 22nd October, 2018 whereby the appellants were convicted for cruelty and murder of one Jyoti (deceased); and also the order on sentence dated 25th October, 2018 whereby all the three appellants were directed to undergo imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.2 lakhs each in default whereof simple imprisonment for six months for offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC") and were also directed to undergo simple imprisonment for three years along with fine of Rs.1 lakh each in default whereof simple imprisonment for four months of offence punishable under Section 498A/34 IPC. The appellants were acquitted for offence punishable under Section 306/34 IPC and no leave to appeal has been sought by the State challenging the said acquittal.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that the deceased was the wife of appellant Pawan Kumar who married each other on 21st February, 2003. Appellant Sushila and Pritam @ Sonu are the step mother and brother of appellant Pawan Kumar. Out of this wedlock, one daughter `S' (PW-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top