MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Surender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Aggarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral):
1. This petition impugns the order dated 21.05.2018 passed by Civil Judge, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi (`Trial Court') in Civil Suit No. 6359/2016, titled as Smt. Vijay Aggrawal v. Sh. Surinder Malik & Ors., whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC') was dismissed. The operative portion of the judgment reads as under:
"12. Present facts in hand are analysed on threshold of the observations made above. In the instant matter, defendant no.2 virtually intended to substitute substantially the existing written statement with in the form of amended written statement. A perusal of the proposed amendment would show that each and every para of the preliminary objection of original written statement namely para no. 1 to 4 are sought to be substituted by new 10 paras and para no.3,5,7 and 10 of reply on merits are sought to be substituted by new paras. No attempt has been made by the defendant no.2 to point out what is sought to be omitted, altered, substituted or added in the proposed amendment. The lines, phrases and words which are being added o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.