SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3120

AMIT BANSAL
Ranjeet Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Gautam Khazanchi and Mr.Vaibhav Dubey, Advocates, for the Appellant.
Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for the State with SI Shashi, PS. Gulabi Bagh.

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal has been filed seeking setting aside the judgment dated 18th September, 2021 and the order on sentence dated 26th November, 2021, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTSC) (POCSO Act)-01, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 342/363/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO).

2. The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of twelve years for the conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 363 of the IPC and six months rigorous imprisonment under Section 342 of the IPC.

3. The brief facts of the case as set up by the prosecution are as follows:

3.1. The victim, a girl child of four and a half years, was playing in the street outside her house on 11th June, 2017. When the mother of the victim could not find the victim, she sent her husband, being the father of the victim, to look for her. The father of the victim reached the house of the appellant, who was their neighbour and knocked at the door which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top