SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Mohinderjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Jassi @ Arvind Kumar Jassi – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. CM Appl. 3453/2019 under Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 4133 days in filing the appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for setting aside the Order and Judgment dated 28.05.2007 vide which the learned Additional District Judge has allowed the divorce by mutual consent under Section 13(B)(2) of the Hindu marriage Act, 1955 (in short, the `HMA').
2. It is submitted in the application that the divorce by mutual consent under Section 13(B)(2) of the HMA was granted by the learned Additional District Judge vide Order and Decree dated 28.05.2007. It is claimed that the Decree of divorce was obtained by making the appellant believe that the said proceedings were necessary for the appellant to be able to visit and reside in Italy with the respondent. Believing the representation to be true and without the knowledge of the proceedings, she participated in the proceedings for divorce by Mutual Consent.
3. Subsequently, she came to know that a fraud has been committed upon her. She contacted her lawyer who filed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.