IMPORTANT POINT
The Court upheld the jurisdiction of the Trial Court and found no error in its direction to seek information from the companies, as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 53966/2023(for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 1697/2023 & CM APPL. 53967/2023 (stay)

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 25.07.2023 passed by ADJ, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court').

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that a separate order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the Trial Court was impugned in CM(M) 824/2019; wherein a Coordinate Bench of this Court had vide order dated 24.05.2019 directed the Petitioner herein to file an inventory qua the shares of the deceased along with an affidavit in terms of the said order. He states that the Petitioner on 01.07.2019 duly filed an affidavit along with documents before the Trial Court making a full disclosure.

2.1. He states that since there is no finding by the Trial Court with respect to any discrepancy in the information furnished by the Petitioner herein; no further directions to the Companies (in which the deceased held shares) seeking information could have been issued by the said Court. He further states that the Trial Court in these proceedings has no jurisdiction to issue directions and seek information from the Companies, as has been sought to be done.

3. This Court has perused the orders dated 13.03.2019, 24.05.2019 and impugned order dated 25.07.2023. The letters of administration were issued to the Petitioner on 24.12.2009 in furtherance of the order dated 25.07.2005. In the letter of administration, the Petitioner undertook to render to the Trial Court a full and true inventory of all the credits and the property. A relevant portion of the said letters of administration reads as under:

"The petitioner Sh. Rajeev Nagpal having undertaken to administer the same and to make a full and true inventory of the said property and credits and exhibit the same in this Court, within six months from the date of this grant or within such further time as the Court may, from time to time, appoint, and also to render to this Court a true account of the said property and credits within one year from the same date or within such further time as the Court may, from time to time, appoint."

4. In furtherance of the letter of administration, the Petitioner admittedly, collected dividends from the Companies in which the deceased held his shares. It is stand of the Petitioner herein that in the inventory filed by him before the Trial Court, he has made truthful and full disclosures with respect to the receipt of the amounts.

5. However, it is the matter of record that the Respondent No. 3 has been able to point out discrepancies in the first inventory as well as the second inventory, filed by the Petitioner herein.

6. In these circumstances, the Trial court was pleased to pass the following two (2) orders. The orders dated 13.03.2019 and 25.07.2023 both read as under:

"Petitioner has preferred not to file reply to the objections filed by R-3 till date.

I have heard Ld. Counsel for R-3 at length in respect of the inventory furnished by the petitioner. I agree with Ld. Counsel for R-3 that the inventory furnished by the petitioner is incomplete and is not completely supported by required documents; the required bank statements and D-mat account details, and the details of shares and dividend received from the respective companies need explanation from the petitioner.

If the petitioner fails to file the complete details and supportive documents to explain the inventory within one month from today, the requisite information shall be sought directly from the concerned companies and banks at the cost to be borne by the petitioner. In addition, necessary directions may be passed in view of the Section 263 (e) of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Put up for further proceedings on 23/07/2019."

***

"Reply on behalf of the petitioner to the tabular statement of the companies, in which the testator