SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 305

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Sunita Devi - Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Cr) 118 of 2024
Decided On : 07-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Pankaj Sinha, Mr.Manish Kumar, Advocates with petitioner in person.
Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya & Mr.Shivesh Kaushik, Advocates for State & Insp.Sudhir Kumar PS Ashok Vihar with SI Monica and the alleged missing girl.

Headnote:

Habeas Corpus - Missing Minor Daughter - The court issued directions for the production of a missing minor daughter and handed over her custody to the petitioner, who is her mother, after it was revealed that she was more than 3 months pregnant.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking directions to produce her missing minor daughter, who did not return home after leaving for a public toilet and was suspected to have been kidnapped.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the concerned IO to record the statement of the petitioner's daughter under Section 164 Cr.P.C and handed over her custody to the petitioner after it was revealed that she was more than 3 months pregnant.

Issues: Petition for Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to produce missing minor daughter.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the concern for the well-being of the missing minor daughter, who was found to be pregnant, and the need for counseling and further directions from the Child Welfare Committee (CWC).

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with directions for the production of the missing minor daughter, recording of her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C, and handing over her custody to the petitioner, her mother.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed as Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to the respondents to produce missing minor daughter of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that on 03.11.2023, her minor daughter, aged 15 years, did not return back home after she left for using the public toilet in their locality. Petitioner tried to search for her minor daughter but it was to no avail.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to the incident, one person, namely, Rahul aged about 21 years old, who is residing at Azad Pur Masjid Wali Gali across the road where the petitioner is residing, was trying to contact the missing girl. Moreover, prior to the day of incident, petitioner received a threat call of facing dire consequences by one of the friends of abovesaid Rahul saying that her daughter would be kidnapped or taken far away and would be released only after getting pregnant. Therefore, petitioner apprehends that the abovesaid Rahul kidnapped her daughter.

4. Upon petitioner's complaint, FIR No.473/2023 under Section 363 IPC at Police Station Ashok Vihar was registered on 03.11.2023 i.e. on the day of incident at 11:20 pm. Petitioner has averred that she visited the police station many times but no satisfactory response was given to her and the police have not made any effort to find out the whereabouts of her missing minor daughter till date.

5. Notice issued.

6. Mr.Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent and has also produced the missing girl pursuant to order dated 11.01.2024.

7. The missing girl, who is a minor aged 15 years old is present in Court and submits that she is willing to go with her mother i.e. the petitioner herein, who is also present in Court and her mother is also willing to take the custody of her said daughter.

8. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the daughter of the petitioner is more than 3 months pregnant and her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. is yet to be recorded.

9. IO concerned is directed to get statement of the petitioner's daughter recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C and thereafter her custody be handed over to the petitioner.

10. State is also directed to produce the daughter of the petitioner before CWC today itself for counseling and for further directions, keeping in mind the fact that she is pregnant.

11. With directions as aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

12. Copy of this order be given dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top