NAVIN CHAWLA
Honey Verma – Appellant
Versus
Piyush Nautiyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral) - This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, `Cr.P.C.'), praying for quashing of complaint filed by the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short, `NI Act') in Complaint Case No.437/2019 titled Piyush Nautiyal v. Honey Verma, on the ground that the legal notice dated 06.01.2019 issued by the respondent prior to the filing of the complaint is not in terms of the proviso appended to Section 138 of the NI Act.
2. The Complaint has been filed by the respondent/complainant that a cheque bearing No. 684791, dated 02.12.2018 for Rs.2,00,000/- was drawn on the Punjab National Bank, which was returned unpaid. Thereafter, the respondent/complainant issued a legal notice dated 06.01.2019, as provided under Section 138(b) of the NI Act. As the petitioner did not pay the amount, the respondent filed the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act. Summons were issued to the petitioner on the Complaint vide order dated 01.02.2019.
3. In spite of service of notice of this petition, none is appearing for the respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.