Back
YASHWANT VARMA, RAVINDER DUDEJA
Luvleen Maingi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravinder Dudeja, J.
1. The present Writ Petition has been filed, seeking following relief :
2. Shorn of all the unnecessary details, the brief facts are as follows.
3. Petitioner is a Foreign National of Indian origin and a resident of Thailand. He arrived in India from Bangkok on 25.04.2014. Near the exit gate after he had crossed the green channel, the Officers of Customs enquired from the petitioner whether he was carrying any goods which he needed to declare to the Customs, to which, he replied in negative. As per Indian Customs Declaration Form of the petitioner, there were no dutiable goods carried by him. Petitioner had not declared any gold/bullion in Column No. 10 (ii) & (iii) in the declaration form. On his personal search, a gold chain and a gold kara were recovered. After examining the same, the Jewellery Appraiser reported that the total weight of the gold was 501.00 grams, valued at Rs.13,12,861/-. Since the petitioner did not provide any documents regarding the possession of the gold chain and
The court ruled that gold jewellery worn by a foreign national upon entering India is considered personal effects and cannot be confiscated without clear legal prohibition.
Personal jewellery carried by a passenger is not subject to customs restrictions if not intended for import, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines from customs authorities.
The court affirmed that personal jewellery should not be excluded from the category of personal effects under the Baggage Rules, ensuring fair treatment for bona fide tourists.
The Baggage Rules do not apply to jewelry worn by travelers, limiting customs authority in seizing sentimental cultural items, framed as ultra vires under Section 79 of the Customs Act.
The court ruled that the Baggage Rules, 2016, cannot exceed or restrict the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, particularly regarding personal ornaments worn by travelers.
Legal importation of gold requires compliance with customs duty and declaration; failure to declare renders goods liable for confiscation, but redemption options exist under the Act.
Gold and jewellary are freely importable items.Passing through green channel itself is declaration of there being no dutiable goods, more so when there is no attempt to conceal the goods. Intention o....
Worn jewelry is not considered baggage under the Customs Act, and regulations exceeding statutory limits are ultra vires.
Bona fide personal jewellery is protected under personal effects, and failure to provide a personal hearing invalidates confiscation orders by customs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
