DELHI HIGH COURT
S.N.KAPOOR
Lakhmi Chand – Appellant
Versus
Parmananda Khemka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.N. Kapoor, J. (Oral)--This revision petition is directed against an order under Section 35-B of the Code of Civil Procedure holding that the plaintiff had no right to further prosecute the case for his failure to pay costs of Rs. 100/-, and dismissing the suit.
2. Briefly facts giving rise to the present petition are as under:
3. It appears from the order sheet that on 14th January 1985, learned counsel for the plaintiff requested to give a date for evidence and the case was adjourned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 100/-, to 6th February 1985. On 6th February 1985, the plaintiff's counsel was not ready to pay the costs on the ground that the plaintiff did not want to produce the evidence as certified copy of form 'A' had already been filed. It was also clarified that the cost was imposed for adjournment of hearing and copy of form 'A' along with the application was filed after the case was adjourned on 14th January 1985. Thus it appears that plaintiff failed to pay the cost on the next date i.e. 6th February 1985. Despite the request of the counsel for defendant to dismiss the suit, learned Trial Court adjourned the case for arguments on the point of dismissal of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.