SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Franz Zaver Huemer – Appellant
Versus
New Yesh Engineers – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, J. This order proposes to dispose of an application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 CPC seeking grant of ad interim injunction in a suit complaining of infringement of patent.

2. The plaintiff is an Austrian citizen. The suit has been filed through one Mr Raj Kumar Lohiya, a constituted attorney of the plaintiff, so appointed under deed of appointment dated 28.2.1994. The suit accompanied by an application for the grant of ad interim injunction has been filed on 26.2.1994.

3. According to the plaintiff he is an inventor of international fame and in India he4s registered proprietor of the following patent registrations :

Regd. No.DateTitle
16252031.7.85invention for improvement in or relating to winding equipment for winding yarn.
16258907.6.85driving arrangement on a circular loom
16236907.6.85circular loom
1635915.3.84arrangement for tension control supervision of individual warp threads on a loom, particularly a circular loom.
16309517.7.84circular loom.

4. The above said patents are valid and subsisting. The Journal Plasma News, February 1994, brought to the notice of the plaintiff that the defendants were claiming to manufacture and sell "Four Shuttle High Spe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top