SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Ajudhiya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J. (Oral)

1. These writ petitions raises a question of law whether the Labour Court on an application under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act(herein after referred to as 'the Act'), award to the workman the difference in wages which the workman is getting as a daily wager and the wages other regular employee doing same work was getting in the department. In all the cases, workmen had approached the Labour Court under Section 33-C(2) of the Act with the prayer that the workman was a daily wager and he was getting minimum wages whereas other regular employees of the petitioner, doing the same work, were getting more wages. The Labour Court relying upon the judgment in MCD Vs. Ganesh Razak, of this Court, allowed the applications under Section 33-C(2) of the Act and directed that the applicants be given difference in wages for the period for which the application was made, between minimum wages and the wages being paid to the regular employees.

2. The decision in MCD vs Ganesh Razak was challenged by MCD by way of an SLP before Supreme Court and the decision of this Court was reversed by the Supreme Court in (1995) 1 SCC 235 MCD v. Ganesh Ra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top