DELHI HIGH COURT
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Ajudhiya – Respondent
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J. (Oral)
1. These writ petitions raises a question of law whether the Labour Court on an application under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act(herein after referred to as 'the Act'), award to the workman the difference in wages which the workman is getting as a daily wager and the wages other regular employee doing same work was getting in the department. In all the cases, workmen had approached the Labour Court under Section 33-C(2) of the Act with the prayer that the workman was a daily wager and he was getting minimum wages whereas other regular employees of the petitioner, doing the same work, were getting more wages. The Labour Court relying upon the judgment in MCD Vs. Ganesh Razak, of this Court, allowed the applications under Section 33-C(2) of the Act and directed that the applicants be given difference in wages for the period for which the application was made, between minimum wages and the wages being paid to the regular employees.
2. The decision in MCD vs Ganesh Razak was challenged by MCD by way of an SLP before Supreme Court and the decision of this Court was reversed by the Supreme Court in (1995) 1 SCC 235 MCD v. Ganesh Ra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.