SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
Sudeepti Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Director School of Planning & Architecture – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 11th July, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The appellant was pursuing the Bachelor of Planning, four year degree course from the School of Planning and Architecture, Delhi. The said course consists of eight Semesters and as per the relevant Rules, all the semesters are required to be completed within a maximum period of seven years.

3. There is no dispute to the fact that the appellant herein was admitted to the said course in 2001 and has cleared the four Semesters. But a perusal of her performance in various Semesters would indicate that she had taken substantial time and had to reappear in several supplementary examinations with the result that in six years from 2001 till 2006, she was able to clear only four Semesters. As per relevant Rules, she must complete and clear all eight Semesters within seven years. We extract below a chart showing the performance of the appellant herein during the semesters and supplementary examinations in which she appeared:

Four years Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physical planning

Failed in subjects 2,4 &















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top