JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. Objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 with respect to the award dated 8th February, 2005 of Shri. H.C. Gupta, Member (Retd.), M.R.T.P.C. are for consideration.

2. The disputes between the parties arose out of several agreements entered into by the petitioner with different respondents all in relation to letting out of the ground floor of House No. 13, Palam Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi -110057. The cease agreement and the security deposit agreement are between the petitioner and the respondent No. 1 M/s U.C. Jain (HUF) of which the respondent No. 2 Mr. U.C. Jain is the Karta. The Generator Set maintenance agreement is between the petitioner and the respondent No.3 Smt. Rakhee Jain. The AC maintenance agreement is between the petitioner and the respondent No.4 Mr. Ashish Jain. The other maintenance agreement is between the petitioner and the respondent No.5 Ms. Raj Rani Jain and the renovation agreement is between the petitioner and the respondent No.6 M/s Ease Consultants (P) Ltd. Each of the said agreements contained a clause of arbitration of disputes or differences arising out of or in connection with the agreement to be refe