SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
INDERMEET KAUR
Om Prakash Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Lal Aggarwal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Indermeet Kaur, J. (Oral)

1. This appeal has impugned the judgment and decree dated 11.01.2002 which had reversed the findings of the trial Judge dated 20.10.2001 whereby on an application under Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') the suit of the plaintiff Om Prakash Malhotra seeking possession of the suit property i.e. property comprising of ground floor, D-308, Sarvodya Enclave, New Delhi has been decreed in his favour. Impugned judgment has reversed this finding; suit of the plaintiff was remanded back for trial

2. The plaintiff had filed the present suit for possession qua the aforenoted suit property. His contention was that the defendant was inducted as a tenant in the suit property vide registered lease deed dated 09.10.1979 for a limited period of five years. This was w.e.f.01.10.1979. Lease was residential. Thereafter by mutual agreement, the period of tenancy was extended; the first extension was w.e.f. 01.10.1984 to 30.09.1987. This was in terms of an agreement dated 04.04.1985. Thereafter in terms of an agreement dated 21.07.1988, the tenancy was again extended for three years w.e.f. 01.10.1987 to 30.09.199

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top