SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M.L.MEHTA
Spice Entertainment Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Service Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.K. Sikri, J.

1. The relevant facts giving rise to the filing of these appeals, which touch upon the questions of law raised, are as follows:

For the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2002-03, Spice Corp Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the amalgamating company) filed its return of income on 30th October, 2002 declaring 'NIL' income. Subsequently, vide order dated 11th February, 2004, passed by this Court, the said company stood amalgamated with M/s MCorp Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the amalgamated company) with effect from 1st July, 2003. The aforesaid return was selected for scrutiny and notice dated 18th October, 2003 was issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 143 (2) of the Act in the name of "Spice Corp. Ltd.", the amalgamating company. The factum of Spice Corp Ltd, having been dissolved, as a result if its amalgamation with MCorp Private Limited was duly brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer vide letter dated 2nd April, 2004. Despite the aforesaid, the Assessing Officer, vide order dated 28th March, 2005 passed under Section 143 (3) of the Act, framed the assessment on Spice Corp Ltd, the amalgamating Company. The afores

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top